A Learning Climate that Supports Autonomy as a Driver of Students’ Self-Efficacy in Economics Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.856Keywords:
Self-Efficacy, Learning Climate, Autonomy Support, Learning ExperienceAbstract
In the learning process, students’ beliefs in their own abilities do not form spontaneously; instead, they develop through experiences shaped by classroom dynamics and the quality of pedagogical interaction. Low self-efficacy is often a major obstacle to economic learning, especially when students encounter material that requires conceptual analysis and numerical skills. To understand how such self-beliefs are constructed in real classroom contexts, this study explores students’ subjective experiences of interpreting an autonomy-supportive learning climate and how this climate strengthens their self-efficacy. The research employed a qualitative approach using an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) design and involved six grade XI social science students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and documentation, and were analyzed following IPA procedures. The findings generated four key themes: (1) teacher-provided autonomy that fosters confidence through opportunities for student choice; (2) verbal encouragement that helps students interpret their abilities positively; (3) small mastery experiences that serve as internal validation of competence; and (4) a positive classroom atmosphere that provides psychological safety for active participation and exploration. These results emphasize that self-efficacy development is a socio-psychological process influenced by emotional states, interpersonal support, and meaningful learning experiences. The study highlights the importance of creating a learning climate responsive to students’ psychological needs as an effective pedagogical strategy for enhancing self-efficacy in economics learning.
Downloads
References
A. Yulianto, ‘Pengaruh Self-Efficacy Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Siswa Sma’, J. PIPSI J. Pendidik. IPS Indones., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 8–12, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.26737/jpipsi.v4i1.1099.
A. Bandura, Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs. NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1977.
R. Evinjuniawati and D. Fitrayati, ‘Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar dan Lingkungan Belajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Melalui Self Efficacy’, RIGGS J. Artif. Intell. Digit. Bus., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 367–380, Aug. 2025, doi: 10.31004/riggs.v4i3.2020.
A. Utari and S. H. Senen, ‘Pengaruh Self Efficacy Terhadap Prestasi Belajar pada Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi: (Survey Kepada Siswa-Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMAN Se-Kota Bandung)’, Util. J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dan Ekon., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–9, Feb. 2018, doi: 10.30599/utility.v2i1.279.
M. Nurrindar and E. Wahjudi, ‘Pengaruh Self-efficacy Terhadap Keterlibatan Siswa Melalui Motivasi Belajar’, J. Pendidik. Akunt. JPAK, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 140–148, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.26740/jpak.v9n1.p140-148.
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Springer Science & Business Media, 2013.
F. Rosyida, S. Utaya, and B. Budijanto, ‘Pengaruh Kebiasaan Belajar Dan Self-Efficacy Terhadap Hasil Belajar Geografi Di Sma’, J. Pendidik. Geogr. Kaji. Teori Dan Prakt. Dalam Bid. Pendidik. Dan Ilmu Geogr., vol. 21, no. 2, July 2024, doi: 10.17977/um017v21i22016p017.
J. A. Smith, M. Larkin, and P. Flowers, ‘Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis : Theory, Method and Research’, pp. 1–100, 2021.
E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, Handbook of Self-determination Research. University Rochester Press, 2004.
I. P. D. Prasetya, N. Sugihartini, I. K. R. Arthana, and I. M. G. Sunarya, ‘Korelasi Efikasi Diri (Self Efficacy) dan Iklim Sekolah Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) di SMP Negeri 1 Tabanan pada Semester Ganjil Tahun Ajaran 2013/2014’, KARMAPATI Kumpul. Artik. Mhs. Pendidik. Tek. Inform., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 46–50, Mar. 2014, doi: 10.23887/karmapati.v3i1.19783.
D. S. Ones, H. K. Sinangil, C. Viswesvaran, and N. Anderson, ‘The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology : Organizational Psychology’, pp. 1–576, 2015.
E. L. Deci, A. H. Olafsen, and R. M. Ryan, ‘Self-Determination Theory in Work Organizations: The State of a Science’, Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav., vol. 4, no. Volume 4, 2017, pp. 19–43, Mar. 2017, doi: 10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.
A. L. Fitriyah and S. K. Khotimah, ‘Student Engagement pada Siswa MTsN yang Tinggal di Pondok Pesantren: Kontribusi Self Efficacy dan Iklim Sekolah’, J. Psikol. Islam, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 103–116, 2023, doi: 10.47399/jpi.v10i2.337.
M. N. Suprayogi, ‘Hubungan Persepsi Siswa Mengenai Iklim Kelas dengan Orientasi Tujuan Siswa dengan Mengontrol Self-Efficacy (Penelitian pada Siswa SMP Madania Bogor)’, Humaniora, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 263–275, Oct. 2010, doi: 10.21512/humaniora.v1i2.2868.
S. Raehana, ‘Pengaruh regulasi diri, motivasi berprestasi, iklim keluarga, dan efikasi diri terhadap prestasi belajar matematika siswa kelas X SMA Negeri di Kota Makassar’, diploma, Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2013. Accessed: Dec. 09, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://eprints.unm.ac.id/1641/
F. Guay, ‘Applying Self-Determination Theory to Education: Regulations Types, Psychological Needs, and Autonomy Supporting Behaviors’, Can. J. Sch. Psychol., vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 75–92, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.1177/08295735211055355.
M. Gagné et al., ‘Understanding and shaping the future of work with self-determination theory’, Nat. Rev. Psychol., vol. 1, no. 7, pp. 378–392, July 2022, doi: 10.1038/s44159-022-00056-w.
R. M. Ryan, The Oxford Handbook of Self-determination Theory. Oxford University Press, 2023.
Q. Xia, T. K. F. Chiu, M. Lee, I. T. Sanusi, Y. Dai, and C. S. Chai, ‘A self-determination theory (SDT) design approach for inclusive and diverse artificial intelligence (AI) education’, Comput. Educ., vol. 189, p. 104582, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104582.
A. Ahmadi et al., ‘A classification system for teachers’ motivational behaviors recommended in self-determination theory interventions’, J. Educ. Psychol., vol. 115, no. 8, pp. 1158–1176, 2023, doi: 10.1037/edu0000783.
T. K. F. Chiu, ‘Digital support for student engagement in blended learning based on self-determination theory’, Comput. Hum. Behav., vol. 124, p. 106909, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.106909.
R. M. Ryan, E. L. Deci, M. Vansteenkiste, and B. Soenens, ‘Building a science of motivated persons: Self-determination theory’s empirical approach to human experience and the regulation of behavior’, Motiv. Sci., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 97–110, 2021, doi: 10.1037/mot0000194.
T. K. F. Chiu, ‘Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic’, J. Res. Technol. Educ., vol. 54, no. sup1, p. 2, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998.
V. Good, D. E. Hughes, A. H. Kirca, and S. McGrath, ‘A self-determination theory-based meta-analysis on the differential effects of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on salesperson performance’, J. Acad. Mark. Sci., vol. 50, no. 3, pp. 586–614, May 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11747-021-00827-6.
M. Pomerance, Self-Determination in Law and Practice: The New Doctrine in the United Nations. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2024.
R. L. White et al., ‘Self-determination theory in physical education: A systematic review of qualitative studies’, Teach. Teach. Educ., vol. 99, p. 103247, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2020.103247.
T. K. F. Chiu, ‘Student engagement in K-12 online learning amid COVID-19: A qualitative approach from a self-determination theory perspective’, Interact. Learn. Environ., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 3326–3339, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1080/10494820.2021.1926289.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of General Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















