The Perceived Curriculum Development among EFL Cambodian Lower Secondary Teachers

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i4.758

Authors

  • Siem Or University of Cambodia

Keywords:

Curriculum Development , Lower Secondary Teachers , Teacher Agency

Abstract

The issue of teachers’ participation in school decision-making remains a complex and enduring topic of educational research. This study examines the extent to which English language teachers in lower secondary schools in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, engage in curriculum development. Adopting an exploratory design, data were collected through questionnaires administered to 40 Cambodian EFL teachers, followed by in-depth interviews with six participants to obtain qualitative insights. The findings indicate that teachers’ involvement in curriculum development is limited and insufficiently institutionalized, with many respondents reporting low confidence in their decision-making capacities yet expressing a strong aspiration to contribute more actively. Namely, many teachers felt dissatisfied with their restricted role in curriculum-related decisions. The results also reveal the dominance of a top-down management structure and the absence of a collaborative professional culture that recognizes teachers as legitimate stakeholders in curricular decision-making. These findings suggest an urgent need for policy reforms that institutionalize participatory mechanisms, enhance teachers’ professional agency, and foster a more inclusive and dialogic approach to curriculum development in Cambodian schools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

V. Neau, “The Teaching of Foreign Languages in Cambodia: A Historical Perspective,” Language, Culture and Curriculum, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 253–268, Sep. 2003, doi: 10.1080/07908310308666673.

D. Fisher, N. Frey, and J. Nelson, “Literacy Achievement Through Sustained Professional Development,” Read Teach, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 551–563, May 2012, doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01082.

P. H. Kusumawathie, N. Mohamad, and F. Azam, “Application of Outcome Based Curriculum Design Strategy as An Effective Mechanism For Secondary Schools,” European Journal of Special Education Research, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 22–42, 2017.

K. Sey, “Why Is Continuing Professional Development (CPD) Important for Teachers?,” English Academic Essay, 2023.

K. Sey, “Concise Study on Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Continuing Professional Development in Cambodian High Schools,” Journal of Mathematics Instruction, Social Research and Opinion, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 181–192, Jul. 2023, doi: 10.58421/misro.v2i2.144.

C. J. Fox, “What do we Mean When we Say ‘Professionalism?’: A Language Usage Analysis for Public Administration,” The American Review of Public Administration, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 1–17, Mar. 1992, doi: 10.1177/027507409202200101.

T. Lickona, Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantam Books, 1991.

S. Paik, “Teachers’ curriculum decision-making in the context of the decentralization of curriculum policy : the case of Korean middle school teachers,” Michigan State University, 2011.

A. A. Glatthorn, “Cooperative Professional Development: Peer-Centered Options for Teacher Growth.,” Educational Leadership, vol. 45, pp. 31–35, 1987, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:15269260

A. Carl, “The voice of the teacher in curriculum development : a voice crying in the wilderness?,” S Afr J Educ, vol. 25, pp. 223–228, 2005, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142247209

M. J. Popham, Test Better, Teach Better. The Instructional Role of Assessment. Virginia: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, 2003.

C. J. Marsh, Perspectives: Key Concepts for Understanding Curriculum. London: Falmer Press, 1997.

D. Fisher, N. Frey, and J. Nelson, “Literacy Achievement Through Sustained Professional Development,” Read Teach, vol. 65, no. 8, pp. 551–563, May 2012, doi: 10.1002/TRTR.01082.

M. Carroll, Developing a new curriculum for adult learners. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc, 2007.

T. F. Carroll, Social capital, local capacity building, and poverty reduction. Manila: ADB, 2001.

K. Sey, “School Leadership Development Needs: Important Points to Take into Consideration,” English Academic Essay, 2023.

F. L. Perry Jr, Research in applied linguistics: Becoming a discerning consumer. New York: Routledge, 2011.

T. Shilling, “Opportunities and Challenges of Curriculum Mapping Implementation in One School Setting: Considerations for School Leaders,” Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, vol. 7, no. 2, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.3776/joci.2013.v7n2p20-37.

J. Creswell, V. Clark, M. Gutmann, and W. Hanson, “Advance Mixed methods Research Designs,” in Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 2003, pp. 209–240.

L. C. Pearson and W. Moomaw, “The Relationship between Teacher Autonomy and 165 Stress, Work Satisfaction, Empowerment, and Professionalism,” Educational research quarterly, vol. 29, no. 1, 2005.

S. Kvale, “Dominance Through Interviews and Dialogues,” Qualitative Inquiry, vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 480–500, Jun. 2006, doi: 10.1177/1077800406286235.

J. Wellington, Educational research: contemporary issues and practical approaches. London: Continuum, 2000.

Z. Dornyei, Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.

A. A. Glatthorn, “Curriculum Alignment Revisited,” Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, vol. 15, pp. 26–34, 1999.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-10-20

How to Cite

[1]
S. Or, “The Perceived Curriculum Development among EFL Cambodian Lower Secondary Teachers”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1791–1800, Oct. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles