The Effect of Pair Check Learning on The Learning Outcomes of Grade X Students of State Vocational School 1 Panai Hulu
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i4.710Keywords:
History, Learning Outcomes, Phair Check LearningAbstract
Students' academic performance at SMK N 1 Panai Hulu has not consistently met the expected minimum standards. A major contributing factor is the limited variety of teaching methods teachers use, which has resulted in low student engagement and passive learning. While previous studies have shown that cooperative learning models can improve student outcomes, many have not specifically examined their application in history learning within vocational school contexts. This study addresses that gap by applying the Pair Check learning model, which encourages students to take a more active role through independent and collaborative learning. A quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental design was employed. The population consisted of all tenth-grade students, and a sample of 70 students was selected, comprising 35 in Class A and 35 in Class B. Data were collected through pretests and posttests administered before and after the intervention, then analyzed using SPSS version 26. The results revealed a clear improvement in the experimental group: the average score increased from 69.71 (pretest) to 78.03 (posttest), surpassing the school’s minimum criteria. In comparison, the control group improved only from 69.34 to 72.29. An independent samples t-test confirmed this difference was statistically significant (sig. 2-tailed = 0.000 < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that the Pair Check model positively impacts student achievement in history learning. Beyond this context, Pair Check can be integrated into other subjects to foster active participation, peer accountability, and deeper understanding, offering teachers a practical alternative to conventional, teacher-centered methods.
Downloads
References
E. Susanti and H. Endayani, Konsep Dasar IPS. Medan: CV. Widya Puspita, 2018.
D. Nunan, “Syllabus Design | CRLT,” pp. 157–159, 1988.
G. R. Pasaribu, “Implementing Google Classroom in English Learning at Stit Al-Ittihadiyah Labuhanbatu Utara,” E-Link Journal, vol. 8, no. 2, p. 99, 2021, doi: 10.30736/ej.v8i2.483.
H. P. Widodo, “Approaches and procedures for teaching grammar,” English Teaching: Practice and Critique, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 122–141, 2006.
V. Midoro, Guidelines on adaptation of the UNESCO ICT competency framework for teachers, vol. 12. 2013.
B. Rogoff, E. Matusov, and C. White, “Models of teaching and learning: Participation in a community of learners BT - Handbook of education and human development,” Handbook of education and human development, pp. 388–414, 1996.
B. Haralambous, “Australian Steiner Curriculum Framework 2018 Steiner Educational & Academic Foundations,” vol. 1, no. October, 2018.
A. Oswald, “Behavioral Learning Operant Conditioning”.
C. W. Kartiwan, F. Alkarimah, and Ulfah, “Peran Guru Pendidikan Agama Islam dalam Mewujudkan Profil Pelajar Pancasila,” Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 239–246, 2023, doi: 10.23887/jipp.v7i2.59576.
G. R. Pasaribu et al., “The implementation of ICT in teaching English by the teacher of MTS Swasta,” ELECTRUM, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 47–60, 2023.
L. Studies, “National Curriculum Consciousness : Limitations of,” vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 41–47, 2017.
A. Amaliah, F. D. D. Clorion, and G. R. Pasaribu, “The Importance of Mastering Teacher Pedagogical Competence In Improving The Quality Of Education,” Pebsas : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 29–37, 2024.
U. Suharsaputra, Metode Penelitian (Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Tindakan). Bandung: Refika Aditama, 2015.
W. Maiendra, H. Delyana, and L. H. Jufri, “Pengaruh Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Pair Checks Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMP Pertiwi 2 Padang,” Horizon (NY), vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 688–697, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.22202/horizon.v1i4.5186.
N. Hoang Anh, A. Baharloo, and G. Rahis Pasaribu, “Integrating AI-Based Tools to Enhance Speaking Fluency in EFL Classrooms in Labuhanbatu Utara,” Jelim : Journal of Education, Language, Social and Management, vol. 03, p. 1, 2025.
L. N. Awwalina, “Pengaruh Penggunaan Teknik Mind Mapping dan Motivasi Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII di MTs Ma’arif Karangan Trenggalek Tahun Ajaran 2014/2015,” UIN Tulungagung, 2015.
Y. M. H. A. Alrefaee and G. R. Pasaribu, “Hate Speech on Tiktok : A Forensic Linguistic Study,” Journal of Education, Language, Social and Management, vol. 03, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2025.
W. Mentari Hakim, S. Harahap, and G. R. Pasaribu, “The Power of YouTube to Improve Listening Skills,” Journal of English Education, Teaching, And Literature, vol. 02, no. October, p. 2, 2024.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Administrasi. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2016.
M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldana, “Qualitative Data Anlaysis,” 2014. doi: 10.1192/bjp.112.483.211-a.
D. W. Johnson and R. T. Johnson, “Making cooperative learning work,” Theory Pract, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 67–73, Mar. 1999, doi: 10.1080/00405849909543834.
. Betty Cruickshank, Donald R.; Myers, The Act of Teaching. The Ohio State University: U S Department of Health, Education L Welfare National Institute Of Education, 2006.
Muntholi’ah, Konsep Diri Positif Penunjang Prestasi PAI. Semarang: Gunungjati dan Yayasan al-Qalam, 2012.
D. Moursund, “ICT in the Discipline of Reading By Kathryn Korabiak & Nicola Mete,” pp. 1–14, 2004.
A. S. Subekti, “A Study of the Mastery of Complex Sentences of Pre-Service English Teachers,” Ahmad Dahlan Journal of English Studies, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 1, 2017, doi: 10.26555/adjes.v4i2.6399.
S. Th. Gries, Distinguished Lectures in Cognitive Linguistics. 2017.
Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE), “Massachusetts model system for educator evaluation: Classroom teacher rubric,” no. August, 2018.
Willem Saragih and Christine Hutajulu, “Types of Sentences Used by Male and Female Writers in Journal Article Abstracts,” LingLit Journal Scientific Journal for Linguistics and Literature, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.33258/linglit.v1i1.345.
W. Lilik, “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Advokasi Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Fiqih Siswa Kelas VIII di Mts Raudlatul Ulum Sungkai Selatan Lampung Utara,” 2021, Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of General Education and Humanities

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















