Exploring Subjective Employability Outcomes Influenced by Curriculum and Personal Factors in the Cambodian Context

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v4i4.697

Authors

Keywords:

TESOL curriculum quality, Subjective employability outcomes, Teaching practicum, Teaching competence, Self-efficacy, Social capital, Adaptability, Higher education in Cambodia

Abstract

This qualitative study explores how curriculum quality and personal factors shape TESOL students’ and graduates’ perceptions of their employability. The researcher has adopted a constructivist approach to analyse 37 semi-structured interviews with current students and alumni from a four-year TESOL undergraduate program at a private Cambodian university. The findings reveal that curriculum factors, such as content relevance, the balance between teaching theory and practice, and instructional quality, significantly impacted graduates’ confidence and employability. Practical experiences, including teaching practicum and micro-teaching, were crucial in enhancing self-efficacy and job readiness, while many participants found theoretical courses irrelevant to their careers. Personal factors, such as self-efficacy, motivation, social capital, and resilience, further influenced subjective employability outcomes. Graduates with higher self-confidence were more proactive in pursuing jobs, while strong networks led to faster employment. This study contributes to the TESOL employability literature and offers actionable insights for improving curriculum design, student support, and career services. Recommendations include more practical learning opportunities, better mentorship and networking, and fostering a growth mindset to enhance resilience and adaptability in graduates.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. Yorke, Employability in Higher Education: What It Is—What It Is Not. York, U.K.: Higher Education Academy, 2006. Available: https://edwebcontent.ed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/atoms/files/hea-learning-employability_series_one.pdf. edwebcontent.ed.ac.uk

D. J. Finch, L. K. Hamilton, R. Baldwin, and M. Zehner, “An exploratory study of factors affecting undergraduate employability,” Education + Training, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 681–704, 2013. doi: 10.1108/ET-07-2012-0077. Available: https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/et-07-2012-0077/full/html

S. H. Moore and S. Bounchan, “English in Cambodia: Changes and challenges,” World Englishes, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 114–126, 2010. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01628.x. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-971X.2009.01628.x

J. C. Richards and T. S. Rodgers, Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching, 3rd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2014. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/approaches-and-methods-in-language-teaching/340332E115A61DCBC3408E034FC706FC

D. Crystal, English as a Global Language, 2nd ed. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2003. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/english-as-a-global-language/8D39880C1BD713165D17D0E3AC510E5C

A. Kirkpatrick, English as a Lingua Franca in ASEAN: A Multilingual Model. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press, 2010. Available: https://hkupress.hku.hk/pro/809.php

P. Tynjälä, “Toward a 3-P model of workplace learning,” Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 11–36, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s12186-012-9091-z. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12186-012-9091-z

T. S. C. Farrell, Reflective Language Teaching: From Research to Practice. London: Bloomsbury, 2015. Available: https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/reflective-language-teaching-9781472524839/

L. Brady and K. Kennedy, Curriculum Construction, 6th ed. Sydney, AU: Pearson, 2018. Available (TOC): https://www.pearson.com/en-au/media/2471334/9781488619793-TOC.pdf

R. Barnett, “Knowing and becoming in higher education,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 429–440, 2009. doi: 10.1080/03075070902771978. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070902771978

L. Darling-Hammond, “Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence,” Education Policy Analysis Archives, vol. 8, p. 1, Jan. 2000. doi: 10.14507/epaa.v8n1.2000. Available: https://epaa.asu.edu/index.php/epaa/article/view/392

K. M. Zeichner, “Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college- and university-based teacher education,” Journal of Teacher Education, vol. 61, no. 1–2, pp. 89–99, 2010. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0022487109347671

B. Bell and B. Cowie, “The characteristics of formative assessment in science education,” Science Education, vol. 85, no. 5, pp. 536–553, 2001. Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/sce.1022

A. Bandura, Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY, USA: W. H. Freeman, 1997. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Self_Efficacy.html?id=eJ-PN9g_o-EC

R. W. Lent, S. D. Brown, and G. Hackett, “Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 79–122, 1994. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000187918471027X.

N. E. Betz and G. Hackett, “Career self-efficacy theory: Back to the future,” Journal of Career Assessment, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 3–11, 2006. Available: https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ723444.

R. Kanfer, C. Wanberg, and T. Kantrowitz, “Job search and employment: A personality–motivational analysis and meta-analytic review,” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 127, no. 6, pp. 106–139 (orig. article often cited with vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 837–855 across sources), 2001. Available: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11675985/

F. Fugate, A. J. Kinicki, and B. E. Ashforth, “Employability: A psychosocial construct, its dimensions, and applications,” Journal of Vocational Behavior, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 14–38, 2004. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0001879103001259

M. Yorke and P. T. Knight, Embedding Employability into the Curriculum. York, U.K.: Higher Education Academy, 2006. Available: https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/embedding-employability-curriculum

N. Lin, Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge Univ. Press, 2001. Available: https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/social-capital/6D4C4DEBF4AE7A62C18CF81B7BC0BD4C

J. S. Coleman, “Social capital in the creation of human capital,” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, pp. S95–S120, 1988. Available: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2780243

M. Tomlinson, “Graduate employability: A review of conceptual and empirical themes,” Higher Education Policy, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 407–431, 2012. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1057/hep.2011.26

J. Andrews and H. Higson, “Graduate employability, ‘soft skills’ versus ‘hard’ business knowledge: A European study,” Higher Education in Europe, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 411–422, 2008. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03797720802522627

D. Jackson and R. Bridgstock, “What actually works to enhance graduate employability? The relative value of curricular, co-curricular, and extra-curricular learning,” Higher Education, vol. 81, no. 4, pp. 723–739, 2021. Available: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10734-020-00570-x

K. Tymon, “The student perspective on employability,” Studies in Higher Education, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 841–856, 2013. Available: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075079.2011.604407

J. W. Creswell and C. N. Poth, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2018. Available: https://books.google.com/books/about/Qualitative_Inquiry_and_Research_Design.html?id=DLbBDQAAQBAJ

S. B. Merriam and E. J. Tisdell, Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation, 4th ed. San Francisco, CA, USA: Jossey-Bass/Wiley, 2016. Available: https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Qualitative%2BResearch%3A%2BA%2BGuide%2Bto%2BDesign%2Band%2BImplementation%2C%2B4th%2BEdition-p-9781119003601

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2015. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962

I. Etikan, S. A. Musa, and R. S. Alkassim, “Comparison of convenience sampling and purposive sampling,” American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Statistics, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 2016. Available: https://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/article/10.11648/j.ajtas.20160501.11

G. B. Willis, Analysis of the Cognitive Interview in Questionnaire Design. New York, NY, USA: Oxford Univ. Press, 2015. Available: https://global.oup.com/academic/product/analysis-of-the-cognitive-interview-in-questionnaire-design-9780199957750

S. Kvale and S. Brinkmann, InterViews: Learning the Craft of Qualitative Research Interviewing, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2015. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/interviews/book239402

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2020. Available: https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/node/58117/print

M. Q. Patton, Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE, 2015.Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/qualitative-research-evaluation-methods/book232962

Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA, USA: SAGE, 1985. Available: https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/naturalistic-inquiry/book842

G. Guest, A. Bunce, and L. Johnson, “How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability,” Field Methods, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59–82, 2006. Available: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1525822X05279903

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-09-17

How to Cite

[1]
H. Banh, “Exploring Subjective Employability Outcomes Influenced by Curriculum and Personal Factors in the Cambodian Context”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 1571–1588, Sep. 2025.

Issue

Section

Articles