Extracurricular Painting and Elementary Student’s Social Interaction: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i6.2071

Authors

  • Miftakhul Firman Ferdiansyah Efendi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Djuli Djatiprambudi Universitas Negeri Surabaya
  • Setyo Yanuartuti Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Keywords:

Elementary school students, George Herbert Mead, Painting extracurricular activity, Social interaction, Symbolic interactionism

Abstract

Painting extracurricular activities provide elementary school students with opportunities to develop artistic abilities while engaging in social interaction beyond the formal classroom setting. However, studies examining how painting extracurricular activities shape students’ social interaction through a symbolic interactionist perspective, particularly in elementary madrasahs, remain limited. This study aims to analyze how painting extracurricular activities shape social interaction among elementary school students at MI Ihyaul Islam Bolo from a symbolic interactionist perspective. This study employed a descriptive qualitative approach involving nine informants, consisting of one painting extracurricular instructor and eight students. The eight students comprised one male and one female student from each of Grades 1–4, all of whom actively participated in the painting extracurricular activity. The informants were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through observation, semi-structured group interviews with students, instructor interviews, and documentation. Data credibility was established through source and technique triangulation. Data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles, Huberman, and Saldaña, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while George Herbert Mead’s concepts of mind, self, and society were used as the theoretical framework for interpreting the findings. The findings indicate that the painting extracurricular activity provided opportunities for students to communicate, cooperate, assist one another, share materials, appreciate peers’ artwork, exchange opinions, and interact across grade levels. The instructor facilitated these interactions by providing guidance, encouraging communication, and supporting students who experienced difficulties. These interactional processes can be understood through Mead’s concepts of mind, self, and society: students interpreted and responded to others during communication, developed responses to peers’ and the instructor’s reactions, and participated in recurring patterns of cooperation within the extracurricular group. The study contributes to elementary visual arts education by demonstrating how painting activities can provide a contextual setting for the construction of social interaction through communication, mutual assistance, and participation in a shared artistic environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

S. Lestari, “Peran kegiatan ekstrakurikuler dalam pengembangan kepercayaan diri siswa sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 55–63, 2021.

B. Prasetyo, “Lingkungan sekolah sebagai ruang interaksi sosial siswa,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 15–24, 2020.

I. Rahmawati and D. Suryana, “Pembelajaran seni rupa di sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Seni, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 70–79, 2022.

Haryanto, “Aktivitas seni kolaboratif dalam pembelajaran seni rupa di sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 33–42, 2021.

A. Hidayat, “Pembelajaran seni berbasis kolaborasi dalam meningkatkan kerja sama siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 78–86, 2020.

R. Astuti and D. Kurniawan, “Aktivitas seni kolaboratif dan penguatan solidaritas sosial siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Seni dan Budaya, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45–56, 2023.

R. Kusumaningrum, “Peran pembina ekstrakurikuler dalam menciptakan interaksi sosial siswa,” Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 101–110, 2022.

G. H. Mead, Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press, 1934.

H. Blumer, Symbolic Interactionism: Perspective and Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, 1969.

J. W. Creswell and J. D. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2018.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung, Indonesia: Alfabeta, 2022.

L. J. Moleong, Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif, rev. ed. Bandung, Indonesia: Remaja Rosdakarya, 2017.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: SAGE Publications, 2014.

N. Sari and T. Nugroho, “Kegiatan seni berbasis kelompok dalam meningkatkan komunikasi siswa,” Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 60–68, 2022.

N. Putri and S. Wahyuni, “Aktivitas seni visual dan interaksi sosial siswa sekolah dasar,” Jurnal Seni Rupa Pendidikan, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2021.

A. Wibowo, “Ekstrakurikuler dan kohesi sosial siswa di sekolah,” Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Sosial, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 88–97, 2021.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-11-14

How to Cite

[1]
M. F. F. Efendi, D. Djatiprambudi, and S. Yanuartuti, “Extracurricular Painting and Elementary Student’s Social Interaction: A Symbolic Interactionist Perspective”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 7371–7386, Nov. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles