The Contribution of Sense of Purpose to Subjective Wellbeing: A Systematic Literature Review

Heni Saidah; Azam Syukur Rahmatullah; Halim Purnomo

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1692

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1692

Authors

Heni Saidah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4397-4361
Azam Syukur Rahmatullah Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta
Halim Purnomo Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta

Keywords:

Sense of Purpose, subjective wellbeing, Eudaimonic wellbeing, Quality of Life

Abstract

This systematic review synthesizes the contribution of sense of purpose to subjective wellbeing (SWB) and validates it through a bibliometric analysis of keyword co-occurrence. Using a Systematic-oriented Literature Review approach based on the PRISMA protocol, searches were conducted on the Scopus database and Google Scholar for publications in 2021–2025, resulting in 16 articles that met the inclusion criteria and were thematically analyzed, while the conceptual structure of the research field was validated through keyword co-occurrence analysis using VOSviewer against the initial recording of Scopus search results. The results of the thematic analysis identified six themes: health and aging; spirituality and existential wellbeing; sense of purpose as post-adversity psychological capital; socio-structural determinants; meaningful activities in work and social participation; and family and interpersonal relationships. In most themes, sense of purpose appears to act as a psychological mechanism linking external determinants to SWB. However, relationship patterns and directions vary across contexts and should be interpreted with caution given the dominance of cross-sectional design. Bibliometric analysis confirms the structural distinction between predictor and outcome keywords, but reveals minimal direct link strength between the two constructs—indicating terminological fragmentation, not weak substantive linkage. These findings confirm the need to consolidate terminology and adopt a longitudinal design in future studies, and provide an initial basis for interventions to strengthen the sense of purpose during life transitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Diener, “Subjective wellbeing,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 95(3), pp. 542–575, 1984, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.542.

H. L. Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, “Subjective wellbeing: Three decades of progress,” Psychol. Bull., vol. 125(2), pp. 276–302, 1999, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276.

C. D. Ryff, Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological wellbeing,” J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., vol. 57(6), pp. 1069–1081, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069.

E. L. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, “On happiness and human potentials: A review of research on hedonic and eudaimonic wellbeing,” Annu. Rev. Psychol., vol. 52, pp. 141–166, 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.141.

E. L. Deci and R. M. Ryan, “The ‘What’ and ‘Why’ of Goal Pursuits: Human Needs and the Self-Determination of Behavior,” Psychol. Inq., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 227–268, Oct. 2000, doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01.

P. E. McKnight and T. B. Kashdan, “Purpose in life as a system that creates and sustains health and wellbeing: An integrative, testable theory.,” 2009, Educational Publishing Foundation, McKnight, Patrick E.: Department of Psychology, George Mason University, MSN 3F5, 4400 University Drive, Fairfax, VA, U.S., 22030-4444, pmcknigh@gmu.edu. doi: 10.1037/a0017152.

N. A. Hill, P. L., & Turiano, “Purpose in life as a predictor of mortality across adulthood,” Psychol. Sci., vol. 25(7), pp. 1482–1486, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614531799.

K. Czekierda, A. Banik, C. L. Park, and A. Luszczynska, “Meaning in life and physical health: systematic review and meta-analysis,” Health Psychol. Rev., vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 387–418, Oct. 2017, doi: 10.1080/17437199.2017.1327325.

G. N. Pfund and N. A. Lewis, “Aging with Purpose: Developmental Changes and Benefits of Purpose in Life Throughout the Lifespan BT - Personality and Healthy Aging in Adulthood: New Directions and Techniques,” P. L. Hill and M. Allemand, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 27–42. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-32053-9_3.

N. J. van Eck and L. Waltman, “Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” Scientometrics, vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

M. J. Page et al., “The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.,” BMJ, vol. 372, p. n71, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.

C. Bussière, N. Sirven, and P. Tessier, “Does ageing alter the contribution of health to subjective wellbeing?,” Soc. Sci. Med., vol. 268, p. 113456, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113456.

C. Li, G. Ning, Y. Xia, and Q. Liu, “Health benefits of physical activity for people with mental disorders: From the perspective of multidimensional subjective wellbeing,” Front. Psychiatry, vol. Volume 13-2022, 2022, [Online]. Available: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychiatry/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1050208

M. Brooks, E. Taylor, and S. Hamby, “Polyvictimization, polystrengths, and their contribution to subjective wellbeing and posttraumatic growth.,” Psychol. Trauma, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 496–503, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1037/tra0001489.

Z. H. Marznaki, M. Khalilizad, A. Moradi, and M. A. Mamun, “Impact of spirituality on elderly people ’ s quality of life and life satisfaction after acute myocardial infarction : Iranian hospital-based study,” pp. 1–7, 2024, doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.593.

M. Yilmaz, “Exploring the Interplay between Religion, Health, and Subjective Wellbeing in Turkey,” Hitit Theol. J., vol. 22, 2023, doi: 10.14395/hid.1343902.

Gudrun R Gudmundsdottir, Gabrielle N Pfund, Patrick L Hill, and Gabriel Olaru, “Reciprocal associations between sense of purpose and subjective wellbeing in old age,” Eur. J. Pers., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 391–404, May 2024, doi: 10.1177/08902070231176702.

L. Wu and G. Wang, “Fairness, Trust, and Wellbeing Among Young Adults: Evidence from 2021 Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS).,” Healthc. (Basel, Switzerland), vol. 12, no. 21, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/healthcare12212186.

W.-C. Hsu, N.-C. Huang, C.-L. Li, and S. C. Hu, “Exploring determinants of flourishing: a comprehensive network analysis of retirees in Taiwan,” BMC Public Health, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 1939, 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19466-x.

A. Lehmus-sun, “The influence of social investment on subjective capacity throughout the life course,” 2025, doi: 10.1177/09589287251345892.

B. Gaskaree, I. Xodabande, M. Zohrabi, and N. Behshad, “Exploring the relationship between meaning at work and subjective wellbeing among language teachers: A Mixed Method Study,” Aust. J. Appl. Linguist, vol. 8, p. 2289, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.29140/ajal.v8n1.2289.

J. Hu and C. Tan, “The impact of internet use on the subjective wellbeing of older adults : The mediating role of mental health,” pp. 1–15, 2025, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0335985.

C. A. Sanders and L. A. King, “The Downstream Wellbeing Effect of Encounters with the U.S. Criminal Justice System,” Soc. Justice Res., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 446–465, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11211-025-00465-1.

P. Montanari, A. Vitali, and V. Ferraretto, “Air pollution and subjective wellbeing : exploring the link between PM10 and a composite measure of wellbeing,” Popul. Environ., 2025, doi: 10.1007/s11111-025-00504-8.

W. Zhan and Z. You, “Family communication patterns, self-efficacy, and adolescent online prosocial behavior: a moderated mediation model,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., pp. 1–11, 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-03202-2.

N. Podolin-Danner, M. Wenzl, and A. Knorr, “The Swedish version of the multidimensional inventory for religious/spiritual wellbeing – Part II : Development of a four-field typology,” no. November, pp. 1–9, 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029101.

G. N. Pfund, “Keeping the Romance Alive ( and Well ): Sense of Purpose as a Predictor of Relationship Quality and Dissolution,” Arts Sci. Grad. Student Theses Diss., 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.7936/64dv-bd48.

N. Sirven and P. Tessier, “Social Science & Medicine Does ageing alter the contribution of health to subjective wellbeing ?” vol. 268, no. October 2020, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113456.

N. Podolin-Danner, M. Wenzl, A. Knorr, J. Fuchshuber, G. Silani, and H. Unterrainer, “The Swedish version of the multidimensional inventory for religious/spiritual wellbeing – Part II: Development of a four-field typology,” Front. Psychol., vol. 13, p. 1029101, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1029101.

N. Behshad, “Exploring the relationship between meaningful work and subjective wellbeing among language teachers: a mixed-methods study,” Aust. J. Appl. Linguist, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–24, 2025.

N. Jan and V. E. Ludo, “Software survey : VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping,” pp. 523–538, 2010, doi: 10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3.

L. Waltman and N. J. van Eck, “A smart local moving algorithm for large-scale modularity-based community detection,” Eur. Phys. J. B, vol. 86, no. 11, p. 471, 2013, doi: 10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0.

S. E. Hobfoll, “Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress,” Am. Psychol., vol. 44(3), pp. 513–524, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513.

B. D. Rosso, K. H. Dekas, and A. Wrzesniewski, “On the meaning of work: A theoretical integration and review,” Res. Organ. Behav., vol. 30, pp. 91–127, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2010.09.001.