Evaluation Model: A New Approach to Assessing the Quality of Holistic Integrative Early Childhood Development Programs

Aip Saripudin; Herman Beni; Diani Magasida

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1443

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1443

Authors

Aip Saripudin Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Herman Beni Universitas Islam Negeri Siber Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Diani Magasida Kaohsiung Medical University

Keywords:

Early childhood, Holistic, Integrative, Program Evaluation

Abstract

The Holistic-Integrative Early Childhood Education (HI-ECD) program encompasses education, caregiving, health, protection, and child well-being; however, to date, no comprehensive, standardized evaluation model exists to assess the program's implementation in its entirety. This study aims to develop an evaluation model for the HI-ECD program that provides comprehensive information to improve the quality of basic services for young children. The study employed a Research and Development (R&D) approach by adapting the CIPP evaluation model to meet the specific needs of early childhood education units. The development process consisted of several stages, including a preliminary study, an initial design, expert validation, and product revision. The results indicate that the evaluation model developed—namely the IP-HIECD Evaluation Model—consists of two main components: input evaluation and process evaluation, complete with evaluation procedures, a user guide, and assessment instruments. Based on assessments from experts and practitioners, this model achieved a very good validity rating. These findings have implications for improving the effectiveness of HI-ECD program evaluation, providing a measurable overview of program achievements, and strengthening synergy among stakeholders in the management of HI-ECD services in Indonesia, ultimately contributing to the optimization of the growth and development of young children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Puspayanti, “Evaluasi Pembelajaran Diklat Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake,” Andragogi: Jurnal Diklat Teknis Pendidikan dan Keagamaan, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 143–167, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.36052/andragogi.v6i1.52.

M. F. M. Angkur, “Penerapan Layanan PAUD Holistik Integratif di Satuan PAUD,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 4287–4296, May 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2587.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2013 tentang Pengembangan Anak Usia Dini Holistik-Integratif, vol. 60. Jakarta: Pemerintah Republik Indonesia, 2013. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Home/Details/41430/perpres-no-60-tahun-2013

WHO, “Improving Early Childhood Development: WHO Guideline,” World Health Organization, Geneva, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/publications/b/53575

A. McCoy, T. Shafer, and J. P. Williams, “Child Protection in Educational Settings: Findings from Six Countries in East Asia and the Pacific,” UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office, Bangkok, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://www.unicef.org/eap/sites/unicef.org.eap/files/2019-01/Child Protection in Educational Setting.pdf

A. Ambariani and D. Suryana, “Hambatan Implementasi PAUD Berbasis Holistik Integratif,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 5200–5208, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.1599.

D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, Penilaian, dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Nuha Medika, 2012. [Online]. Available: https://perpus-bbgtkjateng.kemendikdasmen.go.id/index.php?id=1507&keywords=&p=show_detail

D. L. Stufflebeam and A. J. Shinkfield, Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications, 1st ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007. [Online]. Available: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/books/198/

M. Basaran, B. Dursun, H. D. Gur Dortok, and G. Yilmaz, “Evaluation of Preschool Education Program According to CIPP Model,” Pedagogical Research, vol. 6, no. 2, p. em0091, Feb. 2021, doi: 10.29333/pr/9701.

S. Aziz, M. Mahmood, and Z. Rehman, “Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 189, May 2018, doi: 10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553.

L. Lina, D. Suryana, and N. Nurhafizah, “Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Program Layanan PAUD Holistik Integratif,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 346, Jun. 2019, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v3i2.200.

R. Hanifa, S. Hartati, and N. Nurjannah, “Implementasi Pelaksanaan Program Pengembangan Anak Usia Dini Holistik Integratif di Satuan PAUD,” Murhum : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 387–399, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.37985/murhum.v4i2.307.

C. M. Pattiruhu, K. Makulua, N. Thalib, E. Elizar, and B. S. Pandia, “Integrative Holistic Learning Strategies in Early Childhood Education,” Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 329–349, Nov. 2023, doi: 10.55849/alhijr.v2i1.549.

V. Ashokan, Holistic Approach for Early Childhood Education. 2015.

C. Corter and J. Pelletier, “Schools as Integrated Service Hubs for Young Children and Families: Policy Implications of the Toronto First Duty Project,” International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 45–54, Nov. 2010, doi: 10.1007/2288-6729-4-2-45.

Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2017.

S. Sumarni, “Model Penelitian dan Pengembangan (R&D) Lima Tahap (MANTAP),” Fakultas Ilmu Tarbiyah dan Keguruan, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://digilib.uin-suka.ac.id/id/eprint/39153/

W. R. Borg and M. D. Gall, Educational Research: An Introduction, 5th ed. New York, NY: Longman, 1989. [Online]. Available: https://search.worldcat.org/title/18520404

M. Basaran, B. Dursun, H. D. Gur Dortok, and G. Yilmaz, “Evaluation of Preschool Education Program According to CIPP Model,” Pedagogical Research, vol. 6, no. 2, p. em0091, 2021, doi: 10.29333/pr/9701.

A. J. Stufflebeam, D. L., & Shinkfield, Evaluation Theory, Models, and Applications. Jossey-Bass, 2007.

D. L. Stufflebeam, The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In International Handbook of Educational Evaluation. 2003.

Jody L. Fitzpatrick, J. R. Sanders, and B. R. Worthen, Program Evaluation Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidlines. Boston United States: Pearson Education, Inc., 2011. doi: 10.4337/9781849808026.00007.

Darodjat and Wahyudhiana, “Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan,” Islamadina, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2015.

Peraturan Presiden, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 60 Tahun 2013. 2013.

J. W. Santrock, Child Development, Thirteenth., vol. 39, no. 07. 2002. doi: 10.5860/choice.39-4098.

United Nations Children’s Fund, Child Protection in Educational settings. Findings from Six Counties in East Asia and the Pacific. Strengthening Child Protection Systems Series: No 2. 2012.

A. Reeves, “Safeguarding and Child Protection In Schools,” in Department of Education, 2016, pp. 86–101. doi: 10.4135/9781473916890.n7.

C. M. Pattiruhu, K. Makulua, N. Thalib, E. Elizar, and B. S. Pandia, “Integrative Holistic Learning Strategies in Early Childhood Education,” Al-Hijr: Journal of Adulearn World, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 329–349, 2023, doi: 10.55849/alhijr.v2i1.549.

S. Aziz, M. Mahmood, and Z. Rehman, “Implementation of CIPP Model for Quality Evaluation at School Level: A Case Study,” Journal of Education and Educational Development, vol. 5, no. 1, p. 189, 2018, doi: 10.22555/joeed.v5i1.1553.

Parul Goswami, “Holistic approach for early childhood education,” International Journal of Research in all Subjects in Multi Languages, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 8–11, 2015.

naeyc.org, “Developmentally Appropriate Practice National Association for the Education of Young Children,” Naeyc.Org, no. April, pp. 1–43, 2020.

World Health Organization, “Improving early child hood development: WHO Guideline,” WHO guideline - Summary, Switzerland, 2023.

M. F. M. Angkur, “Penerapan Layanan PAUD Holistik Integratif di Satuan PAUD,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 5, pp. 4287–4296, 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i5.2587.

World Health Organization and Unesco, WHO guideline on school health services. 2021.

C. Corter and J. Pelletier, “Schools as Integrated Service Hubs for Young Children and Families: Policy Implications of the Toronto First Duty Project,” International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 45–54, 2010, doi: 10.1007/2288-6729-4-2-45.

G. S. Sadiah, N. F. Romadhona, and A. D. Gustiana, “Penerapan Layanan Kesehatan Dan Gizi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Paud Holistik Integratif di Tk Alam Pelopor Rancaekek,” Edukids, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 50–64, 2020, doi: 10.17509/edukid.v17i1.24260.

G. S. Sadiah, N. F. Romadhona, and A. D. Gustiana, “Penerapan Layanan Kesehatan Dan Gizi Dalam Penyelenggaraan Paud Holistik Integratif Di Tk Alam Pelopor Rancaekek,” Edukid: Jurnal Pertumbuhan, Perkembangan dan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 50–64, 2020, doi: 10.17509/edukid.v17i1.24260.

Unicef, “Global Statistics on Children’s Protection from Violence, Exploitation and Abuse,” 2014.

M. Ulfah, “Pendekatan Holistik Integratif Berbasis Penguatan Keluarga pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini Full Day,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 10, 2019, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v4i1.255.

D. Mardapi, Pengukuran, penilaian, dan evaluasi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2012.

O. I. K. Nuarca, “Pedoman Penilaian Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini *),” pp. 1–10, 2013.

Y. K. Dewi, “Pengembangan instrumen non tes berbasis scientific approach untuk pemetaan hasil belajar fisika siswa SMA pada Kompetensi Spiritual,” 2017.

I. F. Zahro, “Penilaian dalam pembelajaran anak usia dini,” Tunas Siliwangi, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 92–111, 2015.

L. Lina, D. Suryana, and N. Nurhafizah, “Penerapan Model Evaluasi CIPP dalam Mengevaluasi Program Layanan PAUD Holistik Integratif,” Jurnal Obsesi : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 3, no. 2, p. 346, 2019, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v3i2.200.