Policy Literacy and Farmer Capacity as Determinants of Corn Productivity: An Educational Governance Perspective from Gorontalo

Merita Ayu Indrianti; Dewa Oka Suparwata; Moh. Muchlis Djibran; Nurlia Ripo

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1435

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i4.1435

Authors

Merita Ayu Indrianti Universitas Muhammdiyah Gorontalo https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4014-1938
Dewa Oka Suparwata Universitas Muhammdiyah Gorontalo
Moh. Muchlis Djibran Universitas Muhammdiyah Gorontalo
Nurlia Ripo Universitas Muhammdiyah Gorontalo

Keywords:

Administrative Exclusion, Digital Bureaucratic Violence, Digital Citizenship , Food Sovereignty, Prospective Structural Analysis, Technocratic Justice

Abstract

The digitalization of agricultural governance in Indonesia has created new challenges in the implementation of fertilizer subsidy policies, particularly for farmers with limited technological capacity. This study aims to analyze the influence of socio-digital literacy, administrative accessibility, and intergenerational support on corn productivity in the Gorontalo Regional Hub following the implementation of Presidential Regulation No. 6 of 2025. The study also examines the relative contribution of policy literacy compared to conventional governance factors in supporting food sovereignty outcomes. This research employed a Sequential Explanatory Mixed-Methods design involving quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quantitative data were collected from 150 corn farmers in the Limboto and Limboto Barat Districts using structured questionnaires, while qualitative data were collected through interviews with policymakers, extension coordinators, and youth intermediaries. Data analysis included descriptive statistics, thematic analysis, and Prospective Structural Analysis using the MICMAC method to identify key systemic variables. The results indicate that socio-digital literacy (LITE_X4) was one of the most influential variables in the governance system, with an influence score of 264 in the MICMAC analysis. Intergenerational support recorded the highest governance score (4.51), while the spatial-digital synchronization variable (P11) showed the lowest score (3.14), indicating persistent administrative barriers in the digital subsidy system. The findings also revealed a positive association between understanding of digital policy and productivity outcomes (r = 0.397, p < 0.01), although the study does not claim direct causation. Qualitative findings showed that youth intermediaries played an important role in helping senior farmers navigate digital administrative systems. This study concludes that digital literacy and administrative accessibility are important components of contemporary agricultural governance. The findings suggest the need for more adaptive digital governance models, participatory extension services, and inclusive policy mechanisms to reduce administrative exclusion in agricultural subsidy systems.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. A. Altieri and V. M. Toledo, “The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants,” J. Peasant Stud., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 587–612, Jul. 2011, doi: 10.1080/03066150.2011.582947.

T. Garner Gruber, “‘Fixing’ hunger in the 21st century: How food sovereignty might turn agriculture ‘Right-side Up,’” Appetite, vol. 47, no. 3, p. 390, Nov. 2006, doi: 10.1016/J.APPET.2006.08.023.

V. Campesina, “Food Sovereignty : A Future without Hunger,” 1996.

A. Bisma, Z. Sirajuddin, and A. Anisa, “Diversifikasi Usahatani Petani Jagung Gorontalo dan Determinannya,” Perbal J. Pertan. Berkelanjutan, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 95–107, Feb. 2026, doi: 10.30605/perbal.v14i1.7138.

A. M. Syahriyanda, E. Fauziyah, D. R. Hidayati, F. F. Muhsoni, M. Z. Alfisuma, and S. A. A. Taridala, “The Impact of the Effectiveness of Fertilizer Subsidy Policy Implementation on the Technical Efficiency of Corn Farmers in Pamekasan Regency,” Agrisocionomics J. Sos. Ekon. Pertan., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 631–652, Nov. 2025, doi: 10.14710/agrisocionomics.v9i3.25667.

D. J. Choruma et al., “Digitalisation in agriculture: A scoping review of technologies in practice, challenges, and opportunities for smallholder farmers in sub-saharan africa,” J. Agric. Food Res., vol. 18, p. 101286, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.jafr.2024.101286.

Y. Yuan and Y. Sun, “Practices, Challenges, and Future of Digital Transformation in Smallholder Agriculture: Insights from a Literature Review,” Agriculture, vol. 14, no. 12, p. 2193, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.3390/agriculture14122193.

Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Presiden Republik Indonesia Nomor 6 Tahun 2025 Tentang Tata Kelola Pupuk Bersubsidi. 2025.

Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 15 Tahun 2025 Tentang Peraturan Pelaksanaan Peraturan Presiden Nomor 6 Tahun 2025 Tentang Tata Kelola Pupuk Bersubsidi. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/319663/permentan-no-15-tahun-2025

Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 Tentang Perubahan Atas Peraturan Menteri Pertanian Nomor 10 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tata Cara Penetapan Alokasi Dan Harga Eceran Tertinggi Pupuk Bersubsidi Sektor Pertanian. 2024.

H. J. Smidt and O. Jokonya, “Factors affecting digital technology adoption by small-scale farmers in agriculture value chains (AVCs) in South Africa,” Inf. Technol. Dev., vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 558–584, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.1080/02681102.2021.1975256.

X. Zhang, Q. Yang, A. Al Mamun, M. Masukujjaman, and M. M. Masud, “Acceptance of new agricultural technology among small rural farmers,” Humanit. Soc. Sci. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 1641, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.1057/s41599-024-04163-2.

N. Ripo, M. A. Indrianti, D. O. Suparwata, and M. M. Djibran, “Dynamics of Fertilizer Subsidy Implementation: A Systemic Evaluation of the 6T Principles on Corn Productivity in Gorontalo,” Pop. J. Penelit. Mhs., vol. 5, no. 1 SE-Articles, pp. 82–90, Mar. 2026, doi: 10.58192/populer.v5i1.4209.

M. Azis and E. A. Suryana, “Komparasi dan Implementasi Kebijakan Digitalisasi Pertanian: Peluang dan Tantangan,” Risal. Kebijak. Pertan. dan Lingkung., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 179–198, 2023, doi: 10.24244/jkebijakan.v10i3.51083.

M. S. Sheikh and L. Berenyi, “E-Governance in Agriculture: A Framework on Digital Technology Adaptation by Smallholder Farmers,” in Central and Eastern European eDem and eGov Days 2023, New York, NY, USA: ACM, Sep. 2023, pp. 78–83. doi: 10.1145/3603304.3603341.

J. R. Fraenkel, N. E. Wallen, and H. H. Hyun, How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 8th ed. New York, NY 10020: McGraw-Hill, 2012. [Online]. Available: chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/http://digilib.upnb.ac.id/files/original/8/975/jack_fraenkel_norman_wallen_helen_hyun-how_to_design_and_evaluate_research_in_education_8th_edition_-mcgraw-hill_humanities_social_sciences_languages2011.1.

M. Godet, Creating Futures: Scenario Planning as a Strategic Management Tool, I. France: Economica Ltd, 2006.

T. W. Schultz, “Investment in Human Capital,” Am. Econ. Rev., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 1–17, May 1961, [Online]. Available: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1818907

J. Mariyono et al., “Farmer field school: Non-formal education to enhance livelihoods of Indonesian farmer communities,” Community Dev., vol. 52, no. 2, pp. 153–168, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1080/15575330.2020.1852436.

C. S. Prajapati et al., “The Role of Participatory Approaches in Modern Agricultural Extension: Bridging Knowledge Gaps for Sustainable Farming Practices,” J. Exp. Agric. Int., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 204–222, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.9734/jeai/2025/v47i23281.

P. Antwi-Agyei and L. C. Stringer, “Improving the effectiveness of agricultural extension services in supporting farmers to adapt to climate change: Insights from northeastern Ghana,” Clim. Risk Manag., vol. 32, p. 100304, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.crm.2021.100304.

A. Jabbar, W. Liu, Y. Wang, J. Zhang, Q. Wu, and J. Peng, “Exploring the Impact of Farmer Field Schools on the Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices and Farm Production: A Case of Pakistani Citrus Growers,” Agronomy, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 2054, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.3390/agronomy12092054.

G. W. Norton and J. Alwang, “Changes in Agricultural Extension and Implications for Farmer Adoption of New Practices,” Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 8–20, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.1002/aepp.13008.

S. Chaudhuri, M. Roy, L. M. McDonald, and Y. Emendack, “Reflections on farmers’ social networks: a means for sustainable agricultural development?,” Environ. Dev. Sustain., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 2973–3008, Mar. 2021, doi: 10.1007/s10668-020-00762-6.

K. Valujeva, E. K. Freed, A. Nipers, J. Jauhiainen, and R. P. O. Schulte, “Pathways for governance opportunities: Social network analysis to create targeted and effective policies for agricultural and environmental development,” J. Environ. Manage., vol. 325, p. 116563, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116563.