English /v/ Under Pressure: Phonological Interference among Kaili Rai EFL Students

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.1197

Authors

  • Adinda Mawadda Rahma Universitas Tadulako
  • Siska Bochari Universitas Tadulako
  • Mukrim Mukrim Universitas Tadulako https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7763-0201
  • Nursehang Thamrin Universitas Tadulako

Keywords:

Phonological Interference, English Pronunciation, Voiced labiodental fricative /v/, ELF Learners, Kaili Rai Language

Abstract

This study investigates phonological interference in the production of the English voiced labiodental fricative /v/ among Kaili Rai EFL students. The research problem arises from the frequent substitution of /v/ with /f/ among Indonesian learners, while variation across phonological positions and specific regional language backgrounds remains underexplored. The objective of this study is to identify the types and frequency of interference in /v/ pronunciation and to examine positional vulnerability in its realization. A descriptive quantitative design was employed. Thirty-four students were selected through purposive sampling from a population of 211. Data were gathered using word lists, minimal pairs, and sentence reading tasks containing /v/ in initial, medial, and final positions. The recordings were transcribed using the International Phonetic Alphabet (IPA) and analyzed through frequency and percentage calculations. The findings reveal three types of interference: substitution, omission, and epenthesis, with substitution emerging as the most dominant pattern. Interference occurred more frequently in word-initial and word-final positions than in medial positions, indicating that phonological position plays a significant role in second language segment production. The results demonstrate that pronunciation difficulty is not solely caused by the absence of a phoneme in the first language but is also shaped by positional distribution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. C. Ellis, “The dynamics of second language emergence: Cycles of language use, language change, and language acquisition,” Mod. Lang. J., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 232–249, 2008.

P. R. Campbell, Population Projections: States. Census Bureau., 2005.

O. Kapranov, “The English fricative consonant/z/as a challenge to Norwegian L1 EFL learners: An error analysis of phonemic transcriptions,” Philol. Est. Tallinnensis, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 148–185, 2022.

P. Roach, English Phonetics and Phonology: A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Kartushina, N., & Martin, C. D. (2019). Third-language learning affects bilinguals’ production in both their native languages: A longitudinal study of dynamic changes in L1, L2 and L3 vowel production. Journal of Phonetics, 77, 100920.

Baese-Berk, M. M., & Morrill, T. H. (2015). Speaking rate consistency in native and non-native speakers of English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(3), EL223-EL228.

T. Indrayadi and I. Kerinci, “Indonesian EFL Students ’ Difficulties in Recognizing English Letters Indonesian EFL Students ’ Difficulties in Recognizing English Letters,” vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 3476–3491, 2021.

M. A. Synopsis, “Arabian Journal of Business and Management Review ( Kuwait Chapter ),” vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 40–47, 2017, doi: 10.12816/0040336.

E. Alfansyah and H. Rahmat, “Phonological Interference in Pronouncing English Sounds a mong Lombok ’ s Senior High School Students,” vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 485–496, 2023.

J. W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. SAGE Publications., 2012.

F. M. Sari, “Exploring English Learners ’ Engagement and Their Roles in the Online Language Course,” vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 349–361, 2020.

A. P. Gilakjani and N. B. Sabouri, “Why Is English Pronunciation Ignored by EFL Teachers in Their Classes ?,” vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 195–208, 2016, doi: 10.5539/ijel.v6n6p195.

L. Kateryna and N. Natalia, “Pronunciation Perils: Overcoming Phonetic Interference In Language Learning,” vol. 39, pp. 386–392, 2024, doi: 10.36074/grail-of-science.10.05.2024.059.

A. D. Astuty, “Phonological Interferences In The English of Buginese Students,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 53–61, 2022.

S. Susanto and S. N. Ardini, “Learning Pronunciation Using Record, Listen, Revise (RLR) Method In Dictionary Speech Assistant - Elsa Speak Application: How The Flow of Thinking Goes,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 883–894, 2024.

Y. Ananta and R. Anugrah, “Interference of Kailinese on Sentence Formation in Indonesian Among Indonesian High School Students,” vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 56–70, 2024.

O. Dona, T. Haryani, and N. Amalia, “Challenges in Pronouncing English Consonant Fricatives : Insights from Indonesian EFL Learners,” vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 160–168, 2024.

T. Nu, M. Nhat, H. Thi, and T. Hien, “R . E . F . L . E . C . T : enhancing Vietnamese EFL undergraduates ’ pronunciation proficiency,” Asian-Pacific J. Second Foreign Lang. Educ., pp. 10–25, 2025.

E. A. Almithqal, “Exploring barriers and facilitators of ICT in English pronunciation instruction : Perspectives from Jordanian tertiary education,” vol. 9, no. 4, 2024.

K. Khairunnisa, “Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika Meta-Analysis : The Effect of Discovery Learning Models on Students ’ Mathematical Ability Meta-Analysis : The Effect of Discovery Learning Models on Students ’ Mathematical Ability,” vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 201–211, 2022.

C. Series, “Students ’ Phonological Awareness in PAUD IT Ihya Assunah,” pp. 2–6, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042069.

Nirwana and Suhono, “Phonological Interference in English Pronunciation Produced by Students at Senior High School (A Case Study of Buginese and Javanese Students),” Anglophile J., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2023.

A. J. Sales, “Language Interference and Generative Phonology in Speech Production among Hiligaynon Native Speakers,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 262–275, 2022.

R. N. Hidayati, I. Yatmikasari, and D. Sulaeman, “English Phonological Interference by Indonesian Speakers in a MoFA ’ s Media Briefing,” vol. 9, no. April, pp. 1–10, 2023.

P. Sobkowiak, “Critical thinking in the intercultural context: Investigating EFL textbooks,” Stud. Second Lang. Learn. Teach., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 697–716, 2016.

S. N. Senowarsito, S., & Ardini, “Phonological Fossilization of EFL Learners: The Interference of Phonological and Orthographic System of L1 Javanese. 3L: Language, Linguistics,” Lit. Southeast Asian J. English Lang. Stud., vol. 25, pp. 74–85, 2019.

S. Rai, V., Khatoon, S., Bisht, S. S., & Mehrotra, “Effect of cadmium on growth, ultramorphology of leaf and secondary metabolites of Phyllanthus amarus Schum. and Thonn,” Chemosphere, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1644–1650, 2005.

W. Dandee, “Improving English Pronunciation Skills by Using English Phonetic Alphabet Drills in EFL Students,” vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 611–628, 2022, doi: 10.5296/jei.v8i1.19851.

Y. Monika, “Journal of Digital Learning and Education Adapting Education : Navigating Hybrid Classrooms in The Post-Pandemic Era,” vol. 04, no. 2, pp. 156–166, 2024, doi: 10.52562/jdle.v4i2.1275.

T. Patihis, L., Oh, J. S., & Mogilner, “Phoneme Discrimination of an Unrelated Language: Evidence for a Narrow Transfer But Not a Broad-Based Bilingual Advantage.,” Int. J. Biling., vol. 19, no. 1, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006913 Why Is English Pronunciation Ignored by EFL Teachers in Their Classes?476768.

R. C. Major, Foreign accent: The ontogeny and phylogeny of second language phonology. Routledge, 2001.

A. E. F. S. Sukardi Weda, “The Relationship between Study Anxiety and Academic Performance among English Student.pdf.” 2018.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-04

How to Cite

[1]
A. M. Rahma, S. Bochari, M. Mukrim, and N. Thamrin, “English /v/ Under Pressure: Phonological Interference among Kaili Rai EFL Students”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 2109–2120, Mar. 2026.

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): February

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of General Education and Humanities

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.