Application of the TPR (Total Physical Response) model to Vocabulary Materials for Junior High School Students of Grade IX Darul U-Loom School, Satun, Thailand

Ardila Nurmala  Sari; Syamsuyurnita Syamsuyurnita

doi:10.58421/gehu.v5i1.1041

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.1041

Authors

Ardila Nurmala Sari Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara
Syamsuyurnita Syamsuyurnita Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

Keywords:

Model TPR, Vocabulary, BIPA, Classroom Action Research, Indonesian for foreign speakers

Abstract

Low mastery of Indonesian vocabulary among foreign-speaking students, characterised by achievement scores below the Minimum Completeness Criteria (KKM), low student participation, and the dominance of teacher-centred instructional methods, remains a major challenge in Indonesian language learning. This research aims to improve the Indonesian vocabulary skills of Grade IX students at Darul U-Loom School, Satun, Thailand, through the application of the Total Physical Response (TPR) model. The study employed a Classroom Action Research (CAR) method using the Kemmis and McTaggart spiral design, comprising planning, action, observation, and reflection stages. The research subjects were 25 Grade IX students. The study was conducted through three stages: pre-cycle, cycle I, and cycle II. Data were collected through vocabulary tests, classroom observations, interviews, and documentation, and analysed using descriptive statistics and N-Gain analysis to measure the level of improvement in students’ vocabulary skills. The results revealed a significant improvement in students’ vocabulary mastery, as indicated by the increase in average scores from 56.40 in the pre-cycle to 67.20 in cycle I and 78.60 in cycle II. Learning completeness also improved from 36% to 88%, while the N-Gain analysis showed an increase from low (0.25) to medium (0.51). These findings indicate that the TPR model is effective in improving Indonesian vocabulary mastery and fostering more active, enjoyable, and meaningful learning for foreign-speaking students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

I. S. Wekke and R. W. Astuti, “Kurikulum 2013 di Madrasah Ibtidaiyah: Implementasi di Wilayah Minoritas Muslim,” Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 33–39, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v2i1.1736.

H. Susanto, “Membangun Budaya Literasi Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Menghadapi Era MEA,” JP-BSI (Jurnal Pendidik. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 1, no. 1, p. 12, Mar. 2016, doi: 10.26737/jp-bsi.v1i1.70.

A. Zulfikar, “Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Embrio Bahasa ASEAN: Peluang dan Tantangan Menuju ASEAN Community 2015.” Aug. 2019. doi: 10.31227/osf.io/wvym9.

N. Kojima, Y. Yulianeta, and M. Moriyama, “Potensi Bahasa Indonesia sebagai Bahasa Internasional melalui Pembelajaran BIPA,” Pros. Konf. Berbahasa Indones. Univ. Indraprasta PGRI, pp. 141–145, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.30998/kibar.28-10-2024.8017.

M. J. Satriawan, P. Padlurrahman, and M. Mohzana, “Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman, Penguasaan Kosa Kata Dan Sikap Bahasa Dengan Keterampilan Menulis Ringkasan Siswa Di Sekolah Dasar,” BADA’A J. Ilm. Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 352–360, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.37216/badaa.v5i2.1174.

Nurhadi dan Roekhan, Dimensi-dimenasi dalam Bahasa Kedua, 4th ed. Bandung: Sinar Baru, 2016.

A. Rizki Arista and S. Syamsuyurnita, “Penerapan Model Interesting, Read Encode, Annotating, And Pondering (Strategy Reap) Dalam Memotret Kemampuan Pelajar Asing Thailand Untuk Menulis Teks Fungsional,” J. Sains dan Teknol., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 980–983, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.55338/saintek.v5i3.2811.

Y. Saragih and A. S. Manurung, “The Role of Media Journalism in Influencing Public Perceptions of Religious Issues in the Digital Age,” vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 137–158.

D. Y. R. Sari, G. Abdullah, and R. B. Ginting, “Implementasi Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Kinerja Guru,” J. Inov. Pembelajaran di Sekol., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 794–804, 2024, doi: 10.51874/jips.v5i2.270.

E. Wahyuningsih, S. O. Tolinggi, and R. U. Baroroh, “Pendekatan Humanistik Melalui Permainan Edukatif Bahasa dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab di Sekolah Islam Terpadu,” Maharaat J. Pendidik. Bhs. Arab, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 17–43, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.18196/mht.v4i1.12437.

R. Amalia, M. F. Sya, and S. H. Nisa, “Studi Literatur: Inovasi Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Menggunakan Metode Total Physical Response (TPR) di Sekolah Dasar,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 7, pp. 7772–7780, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i7.14176.

M. Yunus, S. Halijah, K. Kaharuddin, M. Basri D, and B. Kordja, “PKM Penggunaan Metode Total Physical Response (TPR) dalam Meningkatkan Kosakata Bahasa Inggris Siswa MTs Pesantren Wihdatul Ulum YW UMI,” Intisari J. Inov. Pengabdi. Masy., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13–18, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.58227/intisari.v2i1.123.

I. Rahmawati, A. Rahman, and B. Bunyamin, “Penerapan Metode Total Physical Response Dalam Mengajarkan Bahasa Inggris Materi Kosakata di MTsN Sorong,” Lisan J. Bhs. dan Linguist., vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 14–27, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.33506/jbl.v9i1.732.

L. Monita and A. Prasetyo, “Studi Meta-Analisis Metode Total Physical Response (TPR) dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris,” JEdu J. English Educ., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 19–27, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.30998/jedu.v1i1.4412.

Kemmis & McTaggart, The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. Springer, 2014.

Sanjaya, STRATEGI PEMBELAJARAN Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Martha, 2009.

Sugiyon, Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2019.

D. Pitaloka, “E-court: A digital disruption in law enforcement and its impact on judicial efficiency in Indonesia,” Ex Aequo Bono J. Law, vol. 2, no. 2, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.61511/eaebjol.v2i2.2025.1404.

N. Ismaliza, A. Malika, A. Maharani, P. Lestari, and P. Promadi, “Efektivitas Penerapan Metode Total Physical Response (Tpr) Untuk Peningkatan Penguasaan Mufradat Siswa Kelas V Sd Babussalam Pekanbaru,” Glob. Perspect. Educ. J., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 25–34, May 2025, doi: 10.64008/w3jc1405.

D. Hariyanto, N. A. Kumaat, and A. Kristiandaru, “Pengaruh Aktivitas Fisik Dan Motivasi Belajar Terhadap Kebugaran Jasmani Siswa SDN Kartoharjo 2 Kab. Magetan,” Bravo’s J. Progr. Stud. Pendidik. Jasm. dan Kesehat., vol. 10, no. 3, p. 226, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.32682/bravos.v10i3.2593.

D. Kanahaya, H. Khaerunisa, I. N. Hakiki, N. M. Iskandar, and T. Prasetyo, “Menyelaraskan Tubuh dan Pikiran: Manfaat Kognitif Memasukkan Senam ke dalam Pendidikan Jasmani,” Karimah Tauhid, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 3669–3684, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.30997/karimahtauhid.v3i3.12644.

M. Rahmawati, Alya Nurhaliza Husna, and Syailin Nichla Choirin Attalina, “Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Materi Pecahan Menggunakan Media Interaktif PhET Colorado Pada Siswa Kelas IV SDN 3 Mantingan,” Indones. J. Action Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2024, doi: 10.14421/ijar.2024.31-01.

Putri & Taslim, “The Effectiveness of the TPR (Total Physical Response) Method in Enhancing Students’ Vocabulary,” Int. J. Integr. Sci., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 29–40, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.55927/ijis.v4i1.13387.

S. Susilawati, “Pengaruh Media Flashcard Terhadap Perbendaharaan Kata Peserta Didik Kelas I Sdn 8 Menteng,” Tunas J. Pendidik. Guru Sekol. Dasar, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 73–81, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.33084/tunas.v7i1.3057.

Tepu sitepu, “Analisis Kesalahan Berbahasa dalam Keterampilan Menulis Siswa Nida Suksasat School Thailand,” JBSI J. Bhs. dan Sastra Indones., vol. 5, no. 01, pp. 26–33, 2025, doi: 10.47709/jbsi.v5i01.5840.

M. A. T. S. Saragih, “Pemanfaatan Cerita Rakyat Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Bipa Untuk Penguatan Pemahaman Nilai Kearidan Lokal Indonesia,” Pros. Semin. Nas. BIPA UMSU, vol. 2025, pp. 616–623, 2025.

A. Ikhwati and E. Megawati, “Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran TPR (Total Physical Response) dalam Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris,” DEIKSIS, vol. 10, no. 01, p. 11, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.30998/deiksis.v10i01.1937.