The Role of Teachers in Addressing the Bullying Phenomenon in the Digital Era for Generation Alpha in Elementary Schools

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i1.1018

Authors

  • Suherman Suherman Universitas Islam Nusantara
  • Sri Handayani Universitas Islam Nusantara

Keywords:

Educational Management, Cyberbullying, Generation Alpha, Teachers' Role

Abstract

Bullying, including cyberbullying, has increasingly affected Generation Alpha students in elementary schools, creating challenges for teachers in maintaining a safe and child-friendly learning environment in the digital era. This study aims to analyse the roles of teachers and principals in preventing and addressing bullying through the implementation of G.R. Terry’s management functions: planning, organising, actuating, and controlling at SDN 1 and SDN 2 Pasirjaya. A qualitative approach with a descriptive case study design was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observation, and documentation analysis involving principals, teachers, and students. The findings reveal that teachers and principals have implemented POAC-based management strategies by integrating bullying prevention into instructional planning, establishing collaborative anti-bullying teams, applying character education and digital literacy approaches in daily learning activities, and conducting continuous supervision through behavioural evaluations and digital reporting systems. These practices indicate that the systematic application of management functions enables educators not only to respond to bullying incidents but also to proactively foster a child-friendly school culture and strengthen students’ ethical behaviour in digital spaces.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. A. E. van Aalst, G. Huitsing, and R. Veenstra, “A Systematic Review on Primary School Teachers’ Characteristics and Behaviours in Identifying, Preventing, and Reducing Bullying,” International Journal of Bullying Prevention, vol. 6, no. 2. Springer Science+Business Media, p. 124, Oct. 26, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s42380-022-00145-7.

A. Efianingrum, S. I. A. Dwiningrum, and R. Nurhayati, “Cyberbullying pelajar SMA di media sosial: Prevalnsi dan rekomendasi,” Jurnal Pembangunan Pendidikan Fondasi dan Aplikasi, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 144, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.21831/jppfa.v8i2.38300.

D. M. Ndetei et al., “Face-to-face bullying in and outside of schools and cyberbullying are associated with suicidality in Kenyan high school students: a public health issue,” BMC Psychiatry, vol. 24, no. 1, p. 277, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05739-7.

UNESCO, Safe to learn and thrive: Ending violence in and through education. UNESCO, 2024. doi: 10.54675/lupy3293.

L. A. S, D. A. Situngkir, R. P. Putri, and R. Fauzi, “Cyber Bullying Against Children in Indonesia,” Jan. 2019, doi: 10.4108/eai.5-9-2018.2281372.

H. Herawati, Y. Yusida, and D. Diana, “Pendidikan Karakter di Bulan Ramadhan selama Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Pembelajaran Kontekstual,” Jurnal Obsesi Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 3590, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.31004/obsesi.v6i4.2448..

P. Senjaya, J. T. Purba, R. Parani, and M. Tukiran, “Teacher Perception of ICT and Alpha Generation Student,” Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, vol. 4, no. 3, p. 740, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.30605/jsgp.4.3.2021.1508.

R. Muhammad, M. Manja, P. Patriana, and Y. Yusrain, “Al-Ghazali Adab Curriculum as a Life Guide for The Alpha Generation,” Dialogia, vol. 20, no. 1, p. 131, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.21154/dialogia.v20i1.3907.

F. L. Kollo, Z. Zulkarnain, T. Mahfud, and M. Matang, “Beware of cyberbullying! Evidence from high school students in Indonesia,” International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), vol. 13, no. 3, p. 1465, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26686.

T. Premavathi, R. Jain, K. Parmar, and D. Palaniappan, The impact of social media on mental health. IGI Global, 2025, p. 139. doi: 10.4018/979-8-3693-8392-6.ch006.

W. Nur, D. Widyastika, and N. Nabila, “Application of Technology in Improving Primary School Students’ Digital Literacy Skills,” International Journal of Education Language Literature Arts Culture and Social Humanities, vol. 3, no. 1, p. 139, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.59024/ijellacush.v3i1.1288.

F. Aristiati, “Analysis of the Role of MI Teachers in Developing Students’ Social-Emotional Character in the Digital Age: A Literature Review,” ALSYS, vol. 5, no. 6, p. 2135, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.58578/alsys.v5i6.7654.

K. Kadariah, “Analysis of the Principal’s Role in Improving the Quality of Primary School Management,” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Administrasi Publik, vol. 9, no. 2, p. 305, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.26858/jiap.v9i2.12333.

T. Karlina, M. Manalu, and M. Amini, “Profil Fungsi Manajemen Kepala Sekolah dalam Meningkatkan Motivasi Kerja dan Kinerja Guru Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 9650, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i6.4088.

R. Ramadhanti and M. T. Hidayat, “Strategi Guru dalam Mengatasi Perilaku Bullying Siswa di Sekolah Dasar,” Jurnal Basicedu, vol. 6, no. 3, p. 4566, Apr. 2022, doi: 10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2892.

B. Pujiarani, R. M. Ulfah, I. Rahmawati, and T. Maesaroh, “Strategi Pendidik Dalam Menangani Kasus Bullying Di Sdn Mandalasari 1,” Jurnal Pendidikan dan Penelitian Semesta Mendidik, vol. 2, no. 1, 2025.

I. J. Muchlish, F. Indriani, N. S. Mardefi, and T. Hernadi, “Role of teacher in handling the bullying behavior in students of elementary school,” International Journal on Education Insight, vol. 4, no. 1, p. 15, Apr. 2023, doi: 10.12928/ijei.v4i1.10294.

G. R. Terry, “Dasar-dasar Manajemen Edisi Revisi,” 2021.

S. Baškarada, “Qualitative Case Study Guidelines,” The Qualitative Report, Oct. 2014, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2014.1008.

J. W. Creswell, “Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches, 2nd ed.,” Jan. 2007, Accessed: Nov. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2006-13099-000

K. Mizukoshi, “Case Study Research and Applications,” Quarterly Journal of Marketing, vol. 43, no. 2, p. 3, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.7222/marketing.2023.045.

K. E. Johnson and R. E. Stake, “The Art of Case Study Research,” Modern Language Journal, vol. 80, no. 4, p. 556, Jan. 1996, doi: 10.2307/329758.

C. K. Ang, M. A. Embi, and M. M. Yunus, “Enhancing the Quality of the Findings of a Longitudinal Case Study: Reviewing Trustworthiness via ATLAS.ti,” The Qualitative Report, Oct. 2016, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2480.

G. A. Bowen, “Preparing a Qualitative Research-Based Dissertation: Lessons Learned,” The Qualitative Report, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1846.

P. Hayashi, G. Abib, and N. Hoppen, “Validity in Qualitative Research: A Processual Approach,” The Qualitative Report, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2019.3443.

P. van Esch and L. J. van Esch, “Justification of a Qualitative Methodology to Investigate the Emerging Concept: The Dimensions of Religion as Underpinning Constructs for Mass Media Social Marketing Campaigns,” Journal of Business Theory and Practice, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 214, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.22158/jbtp.v1n2p214.

R. M. Emerson, R. I. Fretz, and L. L. Shaw, Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes, Second Edition. 2011. doi: 10.7208/chicago/9780226206868.001.0001.

H. K. Mohajan, “QUALITATIVE RESEARCH METHODOLOGY IN SOCIAL SCIENCES AND RELATED SUBJECTS,” Journal of Economic Development Environment and People, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 23, Mar. 2018, doi: 10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571.

M. B. Miles, A. M. Huberman, and J. Saldaña, Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook. 2014. Accessed: Nov. 2025.

V. Venkatesh, S. Brown, and Y. Sullivan, Conducting Mixed-Methods Research: From Classical Social Sciences to the Age of Big Data and Analytics. 2023. doi: 10.21061/conducting-mixed-methods-research.

M. B. Miles and A. M. Huberman, “Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 336, Dec. 1994, doi: 10.1016/s0272-4944(05)80231-2.

J. Loh, “Inquiry into Issues of Trustworthiness and Quality in Narrative Studies: A Perspective,” The Qualitative Report, Jan. 2015, doi: 10.46743/2160-3715/2013.1477.

E. G. Guba, “Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries,” ECTJ, vol. 29, no. 2, Jun. 1981, doi: 10.1007/bf02766777.

Y. S. Lincoln and E. G. Guba, “But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation,” New Directions for Program Evaluation, vol. 1986, no. 30, p. 73, Jun. 1986, doi: 10.1002/ev.1427.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-01-18

How to Cite

[1]
S. Suherman and S. Handayani, “The Role of Teachers in Addressing the Bullying Phenomenon in the Digital Era for Generation Alpha in Elementary Schools”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 841–850, Jan. 2026.

Issue

Section

Articles