Application of Collaborative Teamwork Learning Model and Guided Note Taking Model and Their Influence on Students' Ability to Understand Mathematical Concepts

Khannatus Sa’diyah; Arif Muchyidin; Nurma Izzati

doi:10.58421/misro.v1i1.14

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v1i1.14

Authors

Khannatus Sa’diyah SMK Yadika Kedawung Cirebon
Arif Muchyidin IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Nurma Izzati IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Collaborative Teamwork Learning, Guided Note Taking, Mathematical Concepts

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the ability to understand students' mathematical concepts and the responses of students who applied the collaborative teamwork learning model and guided note-taking model, as well as to find out the differences in understanding the mathematical concepts of students who applied the collaborative teamwork learning model and the guided note taking model. This study uses a quantitative approach with experimental methods and a quasi-experimental research design in the form of a posttest-only design. The population of this study were students of class X MAN 1 Cirebon, Cirebon Regency, then selected samples of class X IIS 3 as experimental class II with guided note-taking model and X IIS 4 as experimental class I with collaborative teamwork learning model. Sampling is done by cluster random sampling technique. Through the prerequisite test, namely the normality and homogeneity test, the research data obtained were normally distributed and had homogeneous variance. After conducting the prerequisite test, the researcher tested the hypothesis using the Independent Sample T-Test with the asymp value. Sig (2-tailed) of 0.000. This value is smaller than 0.05, so Ha is accepted. In other words, there are differences in the understanding of mathematical concepts between classes that apply the collaborative teamwork learning model with guided note-taking models on the subject of the sine and cosine rules in class X IIS MAN Cirebon I Cirebon Regency. The average value of the class that applies the collaborative teamwork learning model is 72.38, with 11 students achieving the KKM (Minimum Completeness Criteria), and the guided note-taking model of 78.52, with 29 students completing the KKM (Minimum Completeness Criteria). Both models received a good response from students, with a response of 82% for the collaborative teamwork learning model and 76% for the guided note-taking model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. S. Winkel, Psikologi Pengajaran. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi, 2012.

Rusman, Model-model pembelajaran : mengembangkan profesionalisme guru. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

F. Shadiq, Apa dan mengapa matematika begitu penting. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika, 2007.

V. F. Falentina, A. Muchyidin, and T. S. Nasehudin, “Van Hiele’s Theory and Think Pair Share Cooperative Learning Model and Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student’s Level of Mathematical Thinking,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2022.

A. Muthik, A. Muchyidin, and A. R. Persada, “The Effectiveness Of Students’ Learning Motivation On Learning Outcomes Using The Reciprocal Teaching Learning Model,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 21–30, 2022.

I. S. Aminah, A. Muchyidin, and R. O. Akbar, “ARIAS Learning Model (Assurance, Relevance, Interest, Assessment, Satisfaction) And Their Effect on Madrasah Tsanawiyah Student Creativity,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 39–46, 2022.

P. Ambar, “Mathematical Creativity,” Encycl. Creat. Invent. Innov. Entrep., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1583–1583, 2020, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-15347-6_301020.

A. H. Schoenfeld, “Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics (Reprint),” J. Educ., vol. 196, no. 2, pp. 1–38, 2016, doi: 10.1177/002205741619600202.

Y. W. Lin, C. L. Tseng, and P. J. Chiang, “The effect of blended learning in mathematics course,” Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 741–770, 2017, doi: 10.12973/eurasia.2017.00641a.

D. H. Tong, B. P. Uyen, and N. V. A. Quoc, “The improvement of 10th students’ mathematical communication skills through learning ellipse topics,” Heliyon, vol. 7, no. 11, p. e08282, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08282.

S. Abramovich, A. Z. Grinshpan, and D. L. Milligan, “Teaching Mathematics through Concept Motivation and Action Learning,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2019, 2019, doi: 10.1155/2019/3745406.

B. Mandasari, “The Impact of Online Learning toward Students’ Academic Performance on Business Correspondence Course,” EDUTEC J. Educ. Technol., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 98–110, 2020, doi: 10.29062/edu.v4i1.74.

D. Destomo, Istiatin, and Sudarwati, “Student Learning Achievements Reviewed From Learning Facilities, Peer Environment, Motivation, And Discipline (Study at SMP Batik Surakarta),” Int. J. Econ. Bus. Account. Res., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 554–561, 2021.

R. C. Odeh, O. A. Oguche, and E. D. Ivagher, “Influence of school environment on academic achievement of students in secondary schools in Zone ‘A’ Senatorial District of Benue State, Nigeria.,” Int. J. Recent Sci. Res., vol. 6, no. 7, pp. 4914–4922, 2015, [Online]. Available: http://www.recentscientific.com.

C. Gbollie and H. P. Keamu, “Student Academic Performance: The Role of Motivation, Strategies, and Perceived Factors Hindering Liberian Junior and Senior High School Students Learning,” Educ. Res. Int., vol. 2017, pp. 1–11, 2017, doi: 10.1155/2017/1789084.

D. F. Sengkey, S. D. E. Paturusi, and A. M. Sambul, “Correlations between Online Learning Media Types, First Access Time, Access Frequency, and Students’ Achievement in a Flipped Classroom Implementation,” J. Sist. Inf., vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 44–57, 2021, doi: 10.21609/jsi.v17i1.1008.

M. Ilyas and F. Basir, “Analysis of Student’s Conceptual Understanding of Mathematics on Set at Class VII SMP Frater Palopo,” Pros. ICMSTEA 2016, no. October, pp. 96–102, 2016, [Online]. Available: http://repository.uncp.ac.id/26/6/6. Analysis of Studen%27s Conceptual Understanding %28ICSMTEA%29.pdf.

S. Uki Sajiman and H. Hasbullah, “the Effect of Students Attitude in Mathematics Lessons on Understanding the Concept of Mathematics for High School Students,” Int. J. Adv. Res., vol. 10, no. 02, pp. 582–585, 2022, doi: 10.21474/ijar01/14242.

S. A. A. Kharis, E. Salsabila, and L. D. Haeruman, “Effect of Mathematical Concept Understanding and Mathematical Reasoning on Mathematical Literacy Abilities,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1747, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1747/1/012042.

D. Salim Nahdi and M. Gilar Jatisunda, “Conceptual Understanding and Procedural Knowledge: A Case Study on Learning Mathematics of Fractional Material in Elementary School,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1477, no. 4, 2020, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1477/4/042037.

P. P. Hermawan and N. W. Astuti, “An Overview of Learning Motivation Among Working Students During the Covid-19 Pandemic,” Proc. Int. Conf. Econ. Business, Soc. Humanit. (ICEBSH 2021), vol. 570, no. Icebsh, pp. 1322–1327, 2021, doi: 10.2991/assehr.k.210805.207.

Nurjanah, J. A. Dahlan, and Y. Wibisono, “The Effect of Hands-On and Computer-Based Learning Activities on Conceptual Understanding and Mathematical Reasoning,” Int. J. Instr., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 143–160, 2020, doi: 10.29333/IJI.2021.1419A.

Sudarman, “Penerapan Metode Collaborative Learning untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Materi Mata Kuliah Metodologi Penelitian,” J. Pendidik. Inov., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 94–100, 2008.

A. T. Rahayu, A. Muchyidin, and B. Manfaat, “The Application of The Guided Note-Taking (GNT) Learning Method and its Effect on Student’s Understanding of Mathematics Concepts,” J. Gen. Educ. Humanit., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 12–20, 2022.

A. I. Sunardi, “Student Motivation in Online English Learning,” ELE Rev. English Lang. Educ. Rev., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 110–124, 2021, doi: 10.22515/ele-reviews.v1i2.4034.

S. Gustiani, “Students ’ Motivation in Online Learning During Covid-19 Pandemic Era : a Case Study,” Holistics J., vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 23–40, 2020.

F. D. Pertiwi, “The Learning Motivation and Preferred Learning Activities of Successful Students of English Education Study Program at Universitas Bengkulu. Thesis, English Education Study Program, Education and Teachers Training Faculty, Bengkulu University,” Linguist J. Linguist. Lang. Teach., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 91–102, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/269107473_What_is_governance/link/548173090cf22525dcb61443/download%0Ahttp://www.econ.upf.edu/~reynal/Civil wars_12December2010.pdf%0Ahttps://think-asia.org/handle/11540/8282%0Ahttps://www.jstor.org/stable/41857625.

J. Dunlosky, K. A. Rawson, E. J. Marsh, M. J. Nathan, and D. T. Willingham, “Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology,” Psychol. Sci. Public Interes. Suppl., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 4–58, 2013, doi: 10.1177/1529100612453266.

M. Pedaste et al., “Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle,” Educ. Res. Rev., vol. 14, pp. 47–61, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003.

A. M. Fauziah and T. Nurita, “Activities of students in using worksheet based on Contextual Teaching and Learning,” J. Phys. Conf. Ser., vol. 1417, no. 1, 2019, doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1417/1/012088.