Student Misconceptions in Solving AKM Numeration Problems at SMA Level Viewed From the Personality Differences of Extrovert And Introvert Students

Nisa Alawiyah Gunawan; Yandi Heryandi; Muhamad Ali Misri

doi:10.58421/misro.v2i3.121

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/misro.v2i3.121

Authors

Nisa Alawiyah Gunawan IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Yandi Heryandi IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
Muhamad Ali Misri IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon

Keywords:

Misconceptions, AKM Numeracy, Personality Type

Abstract

This study aims to analyze: (1) Knowing personality types, (2) Results from AKM Numeracy, and (3) Misconceptions about AKM Numeracy based on personality types based on student personality types. This type of research is descriptive qualitative research with a case study design. The data collection technique was done by giving personality questionnaires and AKM Numerical test questions. The results showed that: (1) The tendency of personality types in extroverted students was 36%, and the other 64% had introverted tendencies, (2) The results of completing the AKM Numeracy test had the highest percentage in the misconception category, namely 50.40%, 26.20 % understand the concept, and the other 23.20% do not understand the concept, (3) Misconceptions in AKM Numeracy based on student personality types, shows that the highest misconceptions are found in students with extrovert personality types, with an average percentage of 55.80%, while students with introverted personality types have a percentage of 51.25%. Factors causing these misconceptions include acquiring student answers, studying habits, and the learning media used.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Muhtadi and R. Rochmad, “Bahasa Matematis dalam Penentuan Waktu Siang - Malam menurut Tradisi Sunda,” Plusminus J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 263–274, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.31980/plusminus.v1i2.1221.

P. Nurfadilah and E. A. Afriansyah, “Analisis gesture matematis siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal open-end,” J. Authentic Res. Math. Educ., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 14–29, 2022.

P. Di Martino, F. Gregorio, and P. Iannone, “Transition from school into university mathematics: experiences across educational contexts,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 1–5, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10649-023-10217-0.

S. Geisler, K. Rolka, and S. Rach, “Development of affect at the transition to university mathematics and its relation to dropout — identifying related learning situations and deriving possible support measures,” Educ. Stud. Math., vol. 113, no. 1, pp. 35–56, May 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10649-022-10200-1.

R. Yilmaz, “PROSPECTIVE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ COGNITIVE COMPETENCIES ON REALISTIC MATHEMATICS EDUCATION,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 17–44, Dec. 2019, doi: 10.22342/jme.11.1.8690.17-44.

R. Wulandari, S. Suwarto, and N. Novaliyosi, “Upaya Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Ruang pada Pembelajaran Daring dengan Model Discovery learning,” Plusminus J. Pendidik. Mat., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 197–206, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.31980/plusminus.v1i2.1224.

K. Indra and A. Rahadyan, “Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi Siswa Kelas XI dalam Penyelesaian Soal Tipe AKM pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Persamaan Linear Tiga Variabel,” Didact. Math., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 84–91, Oct. 2021, doi: 10.31949/dm.v3i2.1810.

H. Naufal and S. R. Amalia, “Peningkatan kemampuan literasi matematika siswa di era merdeka belajar melalui model blended learning,” in Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 2022, pp. 333–240.

L. Mahmudah and R. Setianingsih, “Kemampuan Literasi Statistis Siswa SMA Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Sistematis dan Intuitif,” MATHEdunesa, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 255–267, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.26740/mathedunesa.v11n1.p255-267.

Pusat Asesmen dan Pembelajaran, AKM dan implikasinya pada pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kemdikbud, 2020.

D. C. Rohim, “Konsep Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Numerasi Siswa Sekolah Dasar,” J. VARIDIKA, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 54–62, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.23917/varidika.v33i1.14993.

D. Andiani, M. N. Hajizah, and J. A. Dahlan, “Analisis Rancangan Assesmen Kompetensi Minimum (AKM) Numerasi Program Merdeka Belajar,” Majamath J. Mat. dan Pendidik. Mat., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 80–90, 2020, [Online]. Available: http://ejurnal.unim.ac.id/index.php/majamath/article/view/1010/544.

OECD, PISA 2015 asesmen and analytical framework. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017.

Priyanto and S. Desi, Super akses AKM asesmen kompetensi minimum SMK/MK kelas XII. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara, 2021.

Psychologist World, “Carl Jung: Archetypes and Analytical Psychology - Psychologist World.” https://www.psychologistworld.com/cognitive/carl-jung-analytical-psychology (accessed Jul. 11, 2023).

Widya Zulfa Ulwiyah and Muhammad Widda Djuhan, “Kepribadian Ekstrovert dan Introvert pada Siswa Kelas VII G SMP Negeri 2 Ponorogo pada Proses Pembelajaran dalam Prespektif Psikologi Sosial,” JIIPSI J. Ilm. Ilmu Pengetah. Sos. Indones., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 117–140, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.21154/jiipsi.v1i2.253.

P. Patmaniar, S. M. Amin, and R. Sulaiman, “Students’ Growing Understanding in Solving Mathematics Problems Based on Gender: Elaborating Folding Back,” J. Math. Educ., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 507–530, Sep. 2021, doi: 10.22342/jme.12.3.14267.507-530.

V. Timothy, B. Watzka, M. Stadler, R. Girwidz, and F. Fischer, “Fostering Preservice Teachers’ Diagnostic Competence in Identifying Students’ Misconceptions in Physics,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1685–1702, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10763-022-10311-4.

N. Munawaroh, E. E. Rohaeti, and U. Aripin, “Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Berdasarkan Kategori Kesalahan Menurut Watson dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Komunikasi Matematis Siwa SMP,” JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Mat. Inov., vol. 1, no. 5, p. 993, Sep. 2018, doi: 10.22460/jpmi.v1i5.p993-1004.

L. R. Pino-Fan, W. F. Castro, and V. F. Moll, “A Macro Tool to Characterize and Develop Key Competencies for the Mathematics Teacher’ Practice,” Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1407–1432, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s10763-022-10301-6.

S. Arikunto, Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 2013.

G. Matthews, “The personality theories of H. J. Eysenck and J. A. Gray: A comparative review,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 583–626, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00158-5.

D. F. Marks, “The Hans Eysenck affair: Time to correct the scientific record,” Journal of Health Psychology, vol. 24, no. 4. pp. 409–420, 2019, doi: 10.1177/1359105318820931.

L. Gottfredson, “Hans Eysenck’s theory of intelligence, and what it reveals about him,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 103, pp. 116–127, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.036.

G. J. Boyle, “Hans J. Eysenck and Raymond B. Cattell on intelligence and personality,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 103, pp. 40–47, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.029.

P. J. Corr, “Hans J. Eysenck: Introduction to centennial special issue,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 103, pp. 1–7, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.07.018.

S. Kreitler, “Hans Eysenck as a health psychologist,” Pers. Individ. Dif., vol. 103, pp. 153–155, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.010.

F. Farley, “Hans J. Eysenck (1916-1997).,” Am. Psychol., vol. 55, no. 6, pp. 674–675, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.6.674.