Inclusive Teaching Efficacy among Early Childhood Teachers in Zambia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v2i3.88

Authors

Keywords:

Inclusive, Teaching efficacy, Early childhood, Zambia

Abstract

Teachers’ beliefs about their capabilities can impact the quality of implementation of education policies. The inclusive education policy is not an exception in this case. This study explores teachers’ beliefs about their capabilities to teach inclusive early childhood education (ECE)classes under the inclusive education policy. This study has conceptualized this belief as inclusive teaching efficacy. A Qualitative approach with a sample of 15 ECE teachers and two educational officers was interviewed using a semi-structured interview guide. Data were analyzed using interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA). The major themes from the analysis reveal interesting insights into teachers' beliefs about their capabilities to handle inclusive ECE classes. Their capabilities were influenced by knowledge, exposure, training, and CPDs, among other emerging themes. This study demonstrates the need to prepare teachers for the implementation of policies or policy changes in Education. Most importantly, the study targets teachers’ self-beliefs, which feeds into their motivation and quality implementation of the inclusive education policy. It was recommended that inclusive ECE teachers be exposed to inclusive CPDs and that training institutions beef up curricula to equip teachers with adequate knowledge to manage inclusive ECE learners.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. S. Barnett, “Effectiveness of Early Educational Intervention,” Science (80-. )., vol. 333, no. 6045, pp. 975–978, Aug. 2011, doi: 10.1126/science.1204534.

S. H. Eickmann, A. M. Emond, and M. Lima, “Evaluation of child development: beyond the neuromotor aspect,” J. Pediatr. (Rio. J)., vol. 92, no. 3, pp. S71–S83, May 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2016.01.007.

E. Munsaka and B. Matafwali, Human development from conception to adolescence: Typical andatypical trends. Lusaka: University of Zambia Press, 2016.

S. Bredekamp, “The Relationship Between Early Childhood Education and Early Childhood Special Education,” Topics Early Child. Spec. Educ., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 258–273, Jul. 1993, doi: 10.1177/027112149301300305.

K. Kubacka and D’Addio Anna, “Targeting Teacher Education and Professional Development for Inclusion,” J. Int. Coop. Educ., vol. 22, pp. 89–106, 2020.

P. Arnaiz Sánchez, R. De Haro-Rodríguez, and R. M. Maldonado Martínez, “Barriers to Student Learning and Participation in an Inclusive School as Perceived by Future Education Professionals,” J. New Approaches Educ. Res., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 18–24, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.7821/naer.2019.1.321.

B. Hudson, D. Hunter, and S. Peckham, “Policy failure and the policy-implementation gap: can policy support programs help?,” Policy Des. Pract., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–14, Jan. 2019, doi: 10.1080/25741292.2018.1540378.

Ministry of Education Republic of Zambia, Educating Our Future: National Policy on Education. Lusaka: Zambia Educational Publishing House, 1996.

R. H. Hofman and J. S. Kilimo, “Teachers’ Attitudes and Self-Efficacy Towards Inclusion of Pupils With Disabilities in Tanzanian Schools,” J. Educ. Train., vol. 1, pp. 177–198, 2014.

A. Montgomery and P. Mirenda, “Teachers’ Self-Efficacy, Sentiments, Attitudes, and Concerns about the Inclusion of Students with Developmental Disabilities,” Except. Educ. Int., vol. 24, no. 1, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.5206/eei.v24i1.7708.

Y. Leyser, T. Zeiger, and S. Romi, “Changes in Self-efficacy of Prospective Special and General Education Teachers: Implication for inclusive education,” Int. J. Disabil. Dev. Educ., vol. 58, no. 3, pp. 241–255, Sep. 2011, doi: 10.1080/1034912X.2011.598397.

D. Ndhlovu, J. Serenje, K. Muzata, T. Mtonga, and J. Serenje-Chipindi, “Early childhood education in Zambia: inclusion of children with disabilities International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Early childhood education in Zambia: inclusion of children with disabilities,” Int. J. Multidiscip. Res. Dev., vol. 3, no. 8, pp. 126–132, 2016, [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323831636.

K. K. Muzata, “Curriculum implementation for learners with special education needs: the case of selected inclusive and special schools in Zambia,” University of South Africa, 2017.

K. K. Muzata, “In-service Teachers’ Knowledge of the Concept of Inclusive Education and the UNCRPD Principles - Zambia,” Africa J. Soc. Transform., vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–18, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://journals.tangaza.ac.ke/index.php/AJST/article/view/2/2.

K. K. Muzata, “Terminological Abuse versus Inclusion: An Analysis of Selected Terms Used to Describe Persons with Disabilities in Luvale,” J. Lexicogr. Terminol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1–32, 2019, [Online]. Available: https://journals.unza.zm/index.php/jlt/article/view/103/108.

G. Kasongole and K. K. Muzata, “Inclusive Education for Learners with Learning Disabilities in Two Selected Primary Schools of Kabwe-Zambia: A Myth or Reality,” Int. J. Humanit. Soc. Sci. Educ., vol. 7, no. 1, 2020, doi: 10.20431/2349-0381.0701001.

T. A. Grindal, C. Hinton, and J. P. Shonkoff, “The science of early childhood development,” Defending Child. Keep. promise early Educ., vol. 13, 2012.

H. Hammond and L. Ingalls, “Teachers’ Attitudes toward Inclusion: Survey Results from Elementary School Teachers in Three Southwestern Rural School Districts,” Rural Spec. Educ. Q., vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 24–30, Jun. 2003, doi: 10.1177/875687050302200204.

A. T. Alabi, R. O. Oduwaiye, and Y. . . Fasasi, “Learning environment in Nigerian primary schools: challenges to educational administrators,” J. Educ. Res. Dev., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2021.

S. O. Salami, “Psychosocial Predictors of Adjustment Among First Year College of Education Students,” US-China Educ. Rev., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 239–248, 2011.

M. Evashkovsky and A. V Osipova, “Understanding Novice Special Education Teachers ’ and Paraeducators ’ Mentorship Relationships : A Comparative Case Study Understanding Novice Special Education Teachers ’ and Paraeducators ’ Mentorship Relationships : A Comparative Case Study,” J. Spec. Educ. Apprenticesh., vol. 12, no. 1, 2023.

G. SELİN TÜMKAYA and S. MİLLER, “The perceptions of pre and in-service teachers’ self-efficacy regarding inclusive practices: A systematised review,” İlköğretim Online, pp. 1061–1077, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.696690.

R. Schwarzer and R. Fuchs, “Perceived Self-Efficacy Self-Efficacy and Health Behavior Theories,” Predict. Heal. Behav. Res. Pract. with Soc. Cogn. Model., vol. 163, p. 1, 1996.

A. Bandura, “Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change.,” Psychol. Rev., vol. 84, no. 2, pp. 191–215, 1977, doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.

R. Reisenzein, W.-U. Meyer, and M. Niepel, “Surprise,” in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior, 2nd ed., California: Academic Press, 2012, pp. 564–570.

A. Bandura, Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY, US: W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co, 1997.

J. W. Creswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications, Inc, 2009.

J. A. Smith and M. Osborn, “Interpretative phenomenological analysis as a useful methodology for research on the lived experience of pain,” Br. J. Pain, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 41–42, Feb. 2015, doi: 10.1177/2049463714541642.

Downloads

Published

2023-06-03

How to Cite

[1]
D. Singogo and K. K. Muzata, “Inclusive Teaching Efficacy among Early Childhood Teachers in Zambia”, J.Gen.Educ.Humanit., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 199–208, Jun. 2023.

Issue

Section

Articles